Follow Slashdot blog updates by subscribing to our blog RSS feed


Forgot your password?

Comment: Re: Dark matter doesn't exist. (Score 1, Funny) 117

by hAckz0r (#49478397) Attached to: Hubble and the VLT Uncover Evidence For Self-Interacting Dark Matter
Agreed. My own theory does away with the need for both Dark Matter and Dark Energy in one easy to understand step. One only needs to define the photon as a thermodynamic reexpansion of spacetime that was compressed by nearby matter. Gravity becomes an emergent property of spacetime, through the first principals of physics. No magic required. Its about as simple as a theory can get, and as a side benifit it also makes SR, QM and GR mutually dependant. It should be testable, and later papers will help explain the physical nature of both entanglement and the many SR paradox.

Comment: Re: OK (Score -1) 117

by hAckz0r (#49477987) Attached to: Hubble and the VLT Uncover Evidence For Self-Interacting Dark Matter
Very true. They never stop to think that GR may actually be incomplete as a theory. GR in all that it does is only a description of how things move. It is not a description of what makes things move, and that is its major fault as a theory. One needs to step back and begin with first principals to understand better why things move. There is a reason for everything and it takes the ability to admit you dont know how something works to go back and discover how it actually does. If in 100 years you still don't know the answer then there is a reason you don't, that something is called an assumption.

Comment: Dark Matter and Dark Energy are non-existant (Score 1) 236

by hAckz0r (#49361485) Attached to: Dark Matter Is Even More of a Mystery Than Expected
They are both "Dark" because they do not exist. This article is a perfect case example of how Dark Matter would have to be distributed in a manor that generally ignores gravity itself. If it ignores the influence of gravity then how is it that its properties are defined by its influence on other objects through gravitational attraction? Do they really think that it can pull on things but ignore its own pull towards that non-dark matter?

Comment: Re:Yeah, Right. (Score 2) 95

by hAckz0r (#49279119) Attached to: Facebook Introduces Payment System
I could not agree more. They are the most wide open and hackable social media site, and paring up with the one form of currency where you have absolutely no recourse in repudiation of any transactions. Its the 'perfect storm' just waiting to happen. At least with a CC you have limited liability, but in this case you can only make sure you don't have enough money in the account for someone to steal. That means moving money between accounts just to buy something.

Comment: Re: Cheaper method (Score 1) 127

by hAckz0r (#49177763) Attached to: Physicists Gear Up To Catch a Gravitational Wave
You are right. The need for Dark Matter and Dark Energy is indicative of the level of their error. Their first problem is the math describes the motion of gravitation, not the process. Their second problem, because of the first, they are ignoring the first law of thermodynamics. The only way to reconcile both problems is to step back for a reexamination the actual evidence. All it takes is a thermodynamic definition of a photon and the gravitational process emerges as a physical property of spacetime itself. No Dark Matter, no Dark Energy required, an unfortunately for these scientsts no measurable gravity waves either.

Comment: Not likely (Score 1) 576

In order for inter-galactic travel they would need to travel at near the speed of light, which would take more energy than is available in the Universe. Even at light speed they would have had to start their journey thousands of years ago and we only started transmitting radio waves a hundred years ago (give or take), so they would see no particular reason to visit us. Wandering around the Universe at near light speed, for no particular reason, does not seem to be a particularly economic way to travel, considering that they would expend more energy in getting here than the Earth even has to offer for their return. A ship that gobbled up stars and planets along the way might fuel such a craft, but the size of it would make it both impossible to build and impossible to get up to near light speed. Its just not going to happen. They would need to travel by transporter beam to get here, assuming that ever becomes possible.

That being said, if the craft was travelling at light speed you could not see it. The light emitted from the front surface at near the speed of light would be so highly blue shifted that it would be above or in the gamaray zone, but not a particularly powerful source nor a single burst that would then trigger sensors like SWIFT, or Fermi, but might be visible to HESS if they do comparative imaging over time to detect moving gammaray objects *across* its field of view. If its coming right at us probably not.

Due to the laws of physics I can still sleep well at night.

Comment: "hypothetically, you use your Waze" (Score 2) 468

by hAckz0r (#48910873) Attached to: Police Organization Wants Cop-Spotting Dropped From Waze App
And hypothetically they would have to be sitting still for like 20-30 minutes at a time for this to ever be a problem. Somene would have to be scanning the waze map and driving to that location. Happening upon that officer already happens, so nothing new unless the map is directing them there. Reality is that when a person sees an officer on waze, or perhaps the marked location where they were 20-30 minutes ago, they have a tenancy to slow down. Isn't that what they are after when they set up a speed trap? Yea, I know, they loose revenue, but then they can start paying attention to other things that are more important.

Here is a little scenario. An officer stops on the side of the road, and waits until that location gets marked on waze. Then he moves to another street and waits to get marked again, and again. Now the map looks like the police are all over the place. Properly played waze is a force multiplier. If waze were to simply change the marking algorithm so that marking an officer took one user event, but removing it took several, then the police would have the kind of visual presence on the map that would serve their better interest. People in those areas will slow down, and no you won't know which is current and which is merely recent.

Comment: I can offer a solution to the cosmology problem (Score 2) 231

by hAckz0r (#48875703) Attached to: The Paradoxes That Threaten To Tear Modern Cosmology Apart
The answer to the cosmological problem can be found in thermodynamics, and the same solution simultaneously removes the need for Dark Matter, Dark Energy, and explains the origin of the vacuum energy. By partially defining the photon in physical terms Gravity becomes simply a emergent property of spacetime given the existence of vacuum energy and it's interaction with the spacetime curvature. In my paper I logically present an argument for the thermodynamics as a conclusion, and present a theory based on first principals. I defer the complete definition and the photon and structure of spacetime/matter for a later paper, so I apologize in advance for trying to keep the paper small enough to be readable.

On The Thermodynamics Of General Relativity.

I have been looking for constructive feedback on these new ideas, so please do so if you have the time. I published this paper simply to get these new ideas out on the table for discussion by the community while I turn my attention to my next paper on solutions to the paradox of Special Relativity, and later the structure of matter and spacetime. The same solution fits all the open issues I know about.
Thermodynamic Unification Theory

Comment: Re:Man, am I old ... (Score 1) 173

by hAckz0r (#48624747) Attached to: Backblaze's 6 TB Hard Drive Face-Off
My first PC still had the first model 64kb motherboard, and the cassete IO interface, but instead I splurged to install dual 180k single sided floppies and the first 16 color monitor. When hard drives became available I bought one of the first 5MB hd directly from IBM before anyone knew they existed, and it took me the better part of the year to figure out how to do the low level format it needed to be useable. BIOS support? Well, why do they call these the good old days?

Comment: Re:Holy Fuck! (Score 1) 270

by hAckz0r (#48581483) Attached to: Keurig 2.0 Genuine K-Cup Spoofing Vulnerability

[...] to Congress and see if it [...]to make them think.

What? Make them think? Make Congress think? That's an Oxymoron, having both terms in the same sentence.

Besides they will never think, because if they did, then all that money paid to them to buy political/financial favors might be all for naught. The rich will never let that happen.

Comment: Re: SubjectsInCommentsAreStupid (Score 1) 65

by hAckz0r (#48349155) Attached to: Nevada Earthquake Swarm Increases Chance of Larger Quake
Actually, with each small quake it is less likely that that particular area will see a major quake, because the tectonic stresses are being gradually released. What then becomes important is, with those plates sliding, where is the stress now building up? If the areas now building up stress snap under this new pressure we could see something major, but in a different location along the same fault. Some day I would hope we could predict where these stresses are likely to build up and deliberately frack those faultlines to weaken the rock structure so that the stresses never have a chance to build up to any significant magnitude. As long as the stresses dont have a chance to build we could keep the quakes down to a safer level. One day, with enough data collected, we might just be managing quakes by fracking.

Comment: Re: My house of cards, taller than your house of c (Score 1) 103

by hAckz0r (#48293897) Attached to: Physicists Identify Possible New Particle Behind Dark Matter
Do you have any refrence for that assertion? The lensing clearly show actual filiments of higher redaction which would be a completly unnatural static formation for matter to arrange itself in. There is no natural laws of physics that could account for this to my knowledge. Please expand on your assertion, as I would certainly like to know more if there is any real evidence.

Comment: Re:My house of cards, taller than your house of ca (Score 1) 103

by hAckz0r (#48284171) Attached to: Physicists Identify Possible New Particle Behind Dark Matter
We need all the sciences to assemble the complete and real picture. In the case of dark matter we need the philosophy/logic to pull everyone else back down to earth right now. An example of where philosophy/logic comes into play is in falsifying a theory when it breaks the actual laws of physics and thus makes no logical sense. Case in point, "Abell 520 bullet cluster" vs "dark matter" theory. Assuming the most current gravitational lensing experiments are valid, the dark matter theory looks pretty dim right now. In order to get the needed distribution of dark matter that appears in the gravitational lensing survey of Abell 520 you need a "special property" for all dark matter. That special property is that while it provides extra mass to pull on normal matter, the dark matter itself must be immune to being pulled on by normal matter, or it would otherwise not be lensing in the distribution we currently see. That can't be, without breaking the laws of physics as we know it today. Dark matter is therefore not a predictive theory to explain what we currently see, without some kind of heroic extensions glued to its sides. One only needs a single true contradiction to properly falsify a theory, and the consequences of Abell 520 is promptly being ignored.

Dark Matter Core Defies Explanation

Of course I admit I am a little biased in my analysis above, because my own theory actually predicts this lensing effect and doesn't even require any new fictitious or magic particles to do it. When the Abell 520 survey came out it merely confirmed my hypothesis of how the physics actually works at the quantum level.

Elegance and truth are inversely related. -- Becker's Razor