It's not particularly clever to have noticed that the word "con" can be found in "congress" - especially when you consider that you were by no means the first person to come to this realization, and have probably copied this from someone else.
It is most definitely some form of logical fallacy. Congress is spelled with the letters "con", and is therefore made up of a bunch of con-artists... is that your argument?
Even if the latter statement happens to be true, it by no means follows from the former. Furthermore, even if one were to accept that congress is entirely made up of corrupt con artists who are out to steal from the public, you don't present any justification for why you think that private business would be capable of directing funds more efficiently than government (what makes Elon Musk so special as to be beyond the reach of corruption?), or how it would be possible to "get private space to be honestly profitable" without public funds from congress.
And I can't even begin to dissect what your reasoning might be for referring to Lockheed Martin as "L-Mart". Anyone care to take a guess at what that means?
Again - I'm sorry to go off on a rant here like this, but I really hope that we can keep this sort of irrational style of "debate" off Slashdot. If you want to want to write crap like that there are any number of popular news websites out there that allow public comments and cater to a less-educated readership, like ABC News or Fox News, where I think you will find yourself in good company.