
Journal geoswan's Journal: Posts that speak for themselves... 18
For the last eight months or so I have been posting a link to every journal I posted to. So, my posting record is clear.
I've decided to list Mike Hawk's recent posts too. I think they speak for themselves.
You consider two a fleet? Really?
Re:You consider two a fleet? Really?
Re:You consider two a fleet? Really?
You can't lie to detainees now?
Re:Expressing my opinion on US policy is my business
I would smear real menstrual blood on anyone
Re:I would smear real menstrual blood on anyone
Re:I would smear real menstrual blood on anyone
About time the third way came up
Your disclaimers keep getting longer
Re:Your disclaimers keep getting longer
Re:Your disclaimers keep getting longer
Re:Your disclaimers keep getting longer
Re:Answer one simple question.
Re:Answer one simple question.
Re:You post your reply first, read later? Never?
I don't think you know what that means
Re:The crippling effect of the binary world view
Its just that we are more inclusive
Re:I think you are the one who is "anti-American"
Wow, long post! And potty mouth!
Re:Republican inclusiveness, respectability
You missed the point completely
Re:Totally off topic, except to the subject line
Re:2nd more on topic: Special Order 40
Dag nab it he was armed with facts!
Were there any improvements in life in Iraq?
Leaving aside his hostility towards the UN...
Yeah, people are going ape-shit
You don't want to make a comment?
You couldn't be more wrong on this one
Now you are getting interesting again
Of COURSE your feeble mind sees it that way
Re:The importance of consistency
Thats so far all over the place
The discussion already happened
update: 2005/04/15 15:00 GMT
Mike Hawk replied to a post I made in someone else's journal last fall. But that slashdotter seems to have erased their JE. So I moved that link to the end here.
Re:Joe Mariani's "5 lies" considered
One of my other correspondents pointed out that Mike Hawk is a homonym for "My Cock". I hadn't noticed that before.
update: 2005/04/17 2:00 GMT There is nothing wrong with an unusual name
Originally I had quotes around Mike's name. I've removed them since he has explained it is his real name. I got some kidding when I was a kid over my middle name. Not using a middle name, or going by Michael Hawk, shows a younger Mike Hawk learned the same perseverance we see today.
update: 2005/09/13 Has Mike Hawk left? Or just picked a new identity?
There has been nothing posted from his ID in the last five months. I suspect he abandoned his ID, and made one or more new ones. He is the first really rude correspondent I have had who frustrated me so much with his baseless insults that I descended to trying to responding in kind -- at least to a limited extent. I didn't find it satisfying. My second strategy, of merely tracking and listing his ugly and contradictory statements was a lot more satisfying.
Simple Analysis (Score:2)
I still can't believe that you were listing all the evidence that our government is flying suspects (probably innocent) off to other countries to be tortured, and the whole crux of his counter-"argument" was that you used the word "fleet." OMFG U GOT PWND!!
Re:Simple Analysis (Score:2)
I didn't know him, or his record, and I made the mistake of extending courtesy and civility to him. He had another exchange yesterday with another person who didn't know him. Here is the key exchange [slashdot.org]. Peacefinder seems to have figured out a better balance of civility and wariness than I did.
Re: (Score:2)
Re:I mentioned it to someone a while back (Score:2)
Re:I mentioned it to someone a while back (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
Leave it to MH42 and me (Score:1)
You and XopherMV are very good friends of mine, at the same time both of you are fans of my journal. Both of you are very important people for me. I don't want both of you to have bitter verbatim with him. Honestly, if you cannot evaluate his comments, just ignore. Then if you think it's worth while to respond to his comments, then reply. Please do so.
You believe or not, he is a very intelligent person, and to make matters more complicated, his op
Re:Leave it to MH42 and me (Score:2)
Yes, I took what he had to say more seriously than it merited.
I'm honored (Score:1)
Its quite clear to everyone that your frustration grows and grows with each post. You wish you didn't have to reply to my posts, but your journals are so weak that you couldn't possibly get away with not replying. The well-poisoning personal attacks are also failing. You know to ignore me would be to
Don't worry, your posts speak for themselves... (Score:2)
I find it interesting that you would characterize providing a record of your posts as an "attack" and "well-poisoning". I think letting the full body of your comments stand for themselves is eminently fair.
You are correct. You were frustrating me. I tried responding in kind, although it was out of character for me. It was an experiment. I found that kind of frustrating too.
You were right about the frustration. But you are wrong that I have to reply to your
Thanks! (Score:1)
I read your posts to HBI and OnLawn et al sucking up to them and lamenting your fall. After reading them I thought to myself that maybe you do have half a brain. Your groupies here, I'm still not so sure though.
Respond or not. Post my other comments on not. Its all a reflection on you either way.
Yup, and the name is Mike Hawk. Just like there was a basketball player named Ivana Mandic and a football player na
Re:I'm honored (Score:2)
That's nothing. I had three posts dedicated to me. And if people don't remember, they were all from My Cock, oops I mean Mike Hawk.
The well-poisoning personal attacks are also failing. You know to ignore me would be to your peril.
People who write idiotic [slashdot.org], incomprehensible [slashdot.org], or racially offensive crap [slashdot.org] deserve no response. Their own statements do more damage than any response could.
Xopher quit.
I'm still here. YOU just can't write offensive graffiti o
Re:I'm honored (Score:1)
And nobody can shake you because you're too stupid to know what's what. What the fuck is your point? Are you proud to be an idiot or something? In fact, I'm still waiting to see a post of yours that actually has some sort of defensible content.
Puppet (Score:1)
Re:Puppet (Score:1)
Please, no more. It.... it cuts so deep... the pain... the ppaaaaaaaiiiiiiiin.
I was looking for that one (Score:2)
Perfect?! Now THAT'S frickin hilarious.
Re:I was looking for that one (Score:2)
Yeah, I don't want to spoil the fun for anyone, but you guys do realize he isn't serious, yes? It's an act. He's a professional troll. He posts as ridiculous and as inflamatory as he can possibly imagine, so as to gawk amusedly at your responses and prof you further. I know most of the company here, including geosawn himself, will likely not be willing to treat someone as if they are a troll. If Mike Hawk were a real person, doing so would be rude and difficult, even for the more garish of us. But, re