Web2.0 and HTML5 support.
350 built in frameworks.
Modules written in Ruby, Python and Javascript.
An appstore.
A touch screen interface.
Twitter, facebook, reddit etc. etc. integration.

Seriously, we need to start tying down people by their beards soon.

You can't say it has anything to do with the very UNIQUE obesity problem of Americans.
The rest of the world does not have the same problems of obesity. Some parts, like south asia have a carbohydrate intake as high as 90%.
There are huge amounts of other, more likely factors, like all the unhealthy amounts of fats in everything, the injection of waste product (mostly artificial) transfats, primitive GMO that has been used for decades and monocultures of crop.

You could blame any one of these factors, but no, you choose to blame the most common things we've eaten for 100k years.
To conclude that it has only been a "minor" part of our diet is simply wrong, there is no evidence to prove either way. However, I'm not going to listen to the cult of people who have jumped to conclusions and lied innumerable times.
At least people who've proposed the classic diets are honest about their evidence.

I live in the LCHF mecca of Sweden, and I can tell you that this whole thing has started off as a religious cult. And it's backed by huge amounts of money (from the meat industry maybe?)
So, be careful about who you put your trust in.

I will read your document and get back to you, it seems to have original research and new information.

It's a hard question to answer.
But I believe the threat of designer babies was in a theoretical world where parents are able to design babies, but there still isn't a method to correct any kind of mistake retroactively. The child would be at the mercy of their parents whim for the rest of their life.
Seems to be a non-issue with Crispr since the child could later just edit themselves back.

How much this kind of stuff is going to cost, is another problem. I believe that this kind of therapy, because of immense popularity, will quickly hit a hard resource constraint problem.
Some physical resource will run out and drive costs much higher than initially believed

The cat's out of the bag now. I just hope our software is up to the task, or we might be looking at an extinction level event if we unknowingly create nasty genetic viruses.

Explain to me how is yet another Android phone open?

Yes, we all know that the agricultural revolution began 10k years ago. But we now know that humans have been eating grains for 100k years.
Clearly, we've been godawfully wrong about paleolithic diets. This is no surprise, due to the sheer difficulty of finding evidence from such a long time back.
There really hasn't been a reason to, before the church of LCHF started its crusade to eradicate other diets.

Why don't you wait for evidence before jumping to conclusions about what our diet consisted of, in a time long before the written word.

There is ample evidence for major differences in a world of ketosis diet and life in general. Ketosis is/was only predominant in worlds like mongolia and eskimo societies, where food is rare to come by. People become fat during short periods of surplus, which their body will cannibalize during long periods of famine.
No conclusion can be drawn from this about health aspects, except that this kind of diet has been rare globally and historically.

Fact is, most of us are used to a 65-85% carb diet, and it works. Who are you to tell us differently?

Your facts are wrong, we've been eating grains for 100k years, and grasses for 4M years.
We don't know if insulin spikes are bad. They are a natural function of our body, and most of us handle them just fine.
Ketosis is very likely to be meant as a survival function where the body cannibalizes resources that are costly to replenish, in order to survive.

If you want to be on the safe side, the "eatwell plate" model is still the strongest contender for a safe diet, and is officially used in most parts of the world where the population can afford it.

I don't mean to be disrespectful, but just like most LCHF proponents (or carbophobes ;) you are oversimplifying things and jumping to conclusions.

Fact is, we still aren't exactly sure about what we need to eat and in what proportions.
Thankfully most of us have an appetite that regulates our intake almost perfectly, so we do not need to worry much about what we eat, as long as we eat everything. However, in almost all cases where we try to cut out certain substances from our diets we find that bad things start happening, like sailors at sea.

You claim that BMI, a statistical tool, is bullshit. But what about the very weak (and in many cases irrelevant) statistical evidence for entirely turning what we've known about nutrition for thousands of years upside down?

We've been eating grains for 100k years, and grasses for 4M years. I'm not about to listen to a collection of kooks with an agenda to sell training and books for new age hippie diets.
Come back when you've tried this kind of diet for a few more decades, chances are you won't be there to tell about it.

I'm not saying you are wrong, what I'm saying is that you guys are being too vocal about something you still know nothing about.

Looking at both PS4 and Xbox 1(080)
I think the best all-round device, especially when it comes to price, is going to be a $2000 gamer-PC.
Or a cracked PS3...

I was able to play it for a full 20 minutes!
It's the one game I own on PS3 that never went back into the drive.

Seriously, it has USB ports.
People who need the optical drive can just buy it separate.
Most of us would benefit from the inclusion of a 4Tb drive instead, and even the PS3 already had a gigabit nic for fast downloads.

The transfats we are talking about here are waste products which are injected into foods where it isn't noticable. A form of watering down, with a high risk for adverse effects.

You don't get to call others "nuts" when you promote LCHF diets which are unproven to be safe and totally unnatural. Carbs are the energy we use, don't blame others if you eat more than you use up.

Nope, all of these predictions were made before trends were possible. And now the trends are real.
It's just your expectation of a short timeframe that's wrong.

HTML5 is a less shitty (but still as annoying) replacement for flash.
Just about all computer systems are moving toward Linux. Especially now, when the PC has turned into a phone in most homes.
IT is an area worked many clever people, generating scaringly accurate predictions.

Fact is, Java simply isn't a suitable replacement for programming. And that's why people think it won't last.

I have for years tried to find a single redeeming aspect about Java. One of those: I know Java sucks but it has great "something".
Truth is, that it sucks, period. All aspects of its design are fundamentally stupid and divorced from reality.
Before Java we had Perl, just as slow and shitty, but a hell of a lot easier to write and run. But I guess it wasn't an ecosystem owned by a big corporation like Sun.

Java is just one of those overhyped corporate languages, still living off the fumes of past glory. Looking at how quickly a only marginally better language like C#/.net took over, it proves how it was more of a fad than anything else.

What part of Java design isn't braindead?
No, seriously.