Or "one half". I mean a half is a half why add "one" before it?

Try fireflies.ai. it's pretty good and better than Teams AI.

You invite a fireflies agent to a meeting. At the end it will summarize the salient points from any shared presentation/docs and who said what etc.

Fixed that for you!

Part 2 reminds me of Asimov's, "The Bicentennial Man" where a robot wanted to be a human.

Yup. That pretty much describes the Republican pary in the US!

I thought the dog whistle started with, "when Mexicos sends its people . . . " and culminated with "they're eating the dogs".

Obama deported the most illegal immigrants in history. But his fault was that he didn't demonize Mexicans.

Apparently that's what the majority of Americans wanted!

First, they deleted all my apps from the app store. The excuse being that I hadn't "updated" them for a while, and I'm not talking about complying with the latest APIs. Then they deleted my account for lack of activity, i.e., updating of existing apps or uploading new ones.

I have Bose bluetooth/wired over the ears. Cheaper ones, not the top of the line noise cancelling. I don't think earbuds come close to over the ears. But then I haven't tested many.

I like Bose because they're really comfortable even when I wear them for a long time.

India's official stated position is to foment disturbances and separatist insurgents in Pakistan. Go look up the statements of senior Indian officials (foreign minister, interior minister, etc.), won't be too hard to google. Why would India/Pakistan inform the other side of imminent terrorist attack? During the recent terrorist train hijacking in Pakistan, while the event was ongoing, Indian media gave full coverage to the masked terrorists, lauding them as freedom fighters.

As to war, India has tried limited "surgical strikes" with embarrassing results. India has substantial edge over Pakistan in a conventional war. Consequently, Pakistan hasn't signed any "no first use" of nuclear weapons.

There are hard line dumbasses on both sides and there won't be any progress in the foreseeable future.

A decent pair of wireless headphones works best for me. I can hear a pin drop and, of course, crystal clear conversations. Bass is not bad at all. I doubt this could be matched by even a calibrated mid-tier sound system.

"The black hole is about seven times as massive as the sun, give or take 0.8 solar masses"

How does 7xSun equal 0.8 solar masses?

The world has already learned the lesson. Canada in particular. US is not a reliable partner. In any way.

You seem to be fixated on one (one in a multi-million) outlying use-case! First of all, a meatball (human) can make a final call after detailed and precise explanation by the chatbot. And before you start another rant about how it isn't possible because of the "law", the "law" isn't set in stone. Also, the law isn't worldwide.

You sound like an "about to be out of work licensed therapist"!

Why can't the chatbot "describe the situation in detail", include "subtle facial expressions", determine "if what was said was in jest . . ."

Why can't the chatbot call multiple people?

You're grasping at straws. Keep changing the goal posts. It won't matter.