fejikso - Slashdot User

Comment: Re:4th amendment point (Score 1) 325

by fejikso on Tuesday November 23 2010, @03:52PM (#34322916) Attached to: Underwear Invention Protects Privacy At Airport

4th amendment protects you against unreasonable search. Seems like it would apply at the airport. TSA claims that you are contractually obligated to put up with search when you enter the secure area and that your air travel ticket states this and as such is a contract. But, you aren't able to sign away your constitutional rights implying, at least, that this component of the air travel contract is illegal. How does this all square up?

"Unreasonable" is such a sharp, unambiguous word.

Comment: Re:Risks vs. Benefits unknown? (Score 0, Troll) 325

by fejikso on Tuesday November 23 2010, @12:18PM (#34319814) Attached to: Underwear Invention Protects Privacy At Airport

Yeah, right, they get *GROPED*. What an exaggeration. It's just a damn inspection. If you're having those kind of fantasies perhaps you're too repressed or watch too much porn (or both).

If they don't want to get touched, then they shouldn't object to the scans.

Comment: Re:Risks vs. Benefits unknown? (Score 1, Interesting) 325

by fejikso on Tuesday November 23 2010, @11:31AM (#34318948) Attached to: Underwear Invention Protects Privacy At Airport

Forget that. Wonder about the odds of dying from a car crash, since you and millions of Americans decided to avoid flying this year because of the patdowns and since driving is much, much more dangerous than flying. The TSA kills Americans.

The patdowns are not responsible for any deaths. These reactions are caused by the irrational fear and exacerbated prudery of the TRAVELERS.

I have absolutely no problems being scanned or getting a deep patdown. One is in the same situation when you get a physical examination from your doctor. We have no problems with that because we don't want to risk our health. Why can't we do the same for our security?

These officers deal with so many people that I would doubt they would find it pleasurable after the 10,000th traveler. And even if they find pleasure off of it, what's the big frickin' deal? What if I like going to work because there's somebody good-looking in my office? (totally hypothetical, because it's sadly not my case, ha) Does that make me a bad employee? Pff!

You know what pisses me off the most at airports? Not hightened security, but the lack of electric outlets and free (or cheap) wifi. That aggravates me to no end.