Reasons I can think of:
- They're getting slapped down just for insulting the judge.
- Most other judges are wholly owned subsidiaries of the *AA
- Most other judges don't want to anger their politician masters who indisputably are.
- (least likely) They happened upon the only judge who actually believes extorting copyright settlements is illegal.
And I collect Linux distros, that's why I torrent so much!
So anyone know if they're going to be messing with old versions of the android maps app? Because the newer versions of that suck with just as much intensity as on the desktop.
You don't ban something because a few irresponsible people use it improperly," says Phillips. "They can snort black pepper. Do you ban black pepper?"
Actually we ban every single psychologically active substance *except* alcohol and tobacco for precisely that reason, those two being the lucky winners because historically the few irresponsible ones misusing other things were typically not the white male property owners responsible for determining whose favorite substance was allowed.
No one is complaining that they should have the "right" not to be offended.
So the State, having decided that murder is illegal, resorts to murder as "punishment". That is hypocrisy of the highest order.
Not that I'm advocating the death penalty, but that's a bad argument. It's quite illegal for me to put a gun to your head, drag you off to a tiny room, and hold you captive for decades (even if you murdered my family). If I do that to you, the State is sure as hell going to be doing that to me.
There are plenty of laws on the books designed to prevent government agencies from using taxpayer resources on misinforming the public.
If we ever started enforcing such laws the government would collapse.