Put a chip in every vehicle and have vehicles ranked in grades according to wastefulness. Fuel tax is based on grade. Fuel pump receives signal from embedded chip in vehicle and automatically levies appropriate tax rate based on vehicle grade. Thus, driver of Hummer pays $20/gallon. Escalade $15/gallon. Prius $2/gallon. Etc.
I think its better to use NoScript and just block the domains
I'm glad to see the EU handle Facebook as the disease that it is.
How are the Chinese American Family Coalition involved in this?
I wholeheartedly agree. This has been an immense waste of, ultimately, consumers' money over what amounts to crap. I don't understand how that judge in the UK could have sided with Samsung yet in the US the court sided with Apple. I love what the UK judge said too about Samsung not being as "cool" as Apple. LOL.
When Samsung's own lawyers were shown an iPhone and a Galaxy side-by-side, he could not tell them apart at a distance of 16 ft. thats pretty bad, don't you think?
No, because that's generally what small personal electronic devices look like.
Having square corners on them is kind of stupid idea and I don't think that patenting or claiming trade dress on something not being stupid is quite valid, much less innovative.
As for the first in not having a mechanical keyboard, whether that is true or not, that is just something that could be expected to be designed as devices evolve and model designs change. Laying some kind of "We got there first!" claim on something like that reeks of... greed.
Thank you! That was really cool!
I once met someone who was disabled and who boasted to me about his new found source of income working with a lawyer filing ADA lawsuits and collecting. I find it totally disgusting. I think this has also been in the local news about how a lot of little businesses are being shaken down by these grubby lawyers and can't afforded the exorbitant amounts of money. Most of these businesses had absolutely no clue that their store was in any violation before getting the crap sued out of them. No friendly warning given. Just sued and extorted.
I've never heard the term "trade dress" before. What does it mean?
Not long ago I actually watched a multi-episode jdrama one of the main characters of which was a biologist researching the devastating effect a breakwall had had on marine life. A 250-mile long wall sounds absolutely disastrous from an ecological viewpoint.
Not to mention the brutal slaughter of thousands of trapped dolphins every year.
I like the idea of being able to drive from LA to Tokyo.
Considering that assisted suicide techniques are well-researched and well-documented, it seems very strange that they wouldn't simply use any of the preferred, pain-free methods such as the exit bag. What gives?
I just wanted to add here that not only such an effect, but "the mind" (the word "placebo" is so bigoted) has been shown to be capable of powerfully modulating immune responses.
I think the standard should be whether or not a particular remedy is engaging in actual deception. Its one thing to say something like "this remedy provides relief _____" vs. saying something like "this remedy cures _____". Perhaps there should be a requirement of a more clear disclaimer such as "not intended for long-term treatment of ______" or "while providing relief, this remedy has not been shown to address certain underlying physiological aspects of ______"