Catch up on stories from the past week (and beyond) at the Slashdot story archive

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror

Slashdot videos: Now with more Slashdot!

  • View

  • Discuss

  • Share

We've improved Slashdot's video section; now you can view our video interviews, product close-ups and site visits with all the usual Slashdot options to comment, share, etc. No more walled garden! It's a work in progress -- we hope you'll check it out (Learn more about the recent updates).

×

Comment: Re:802.11b? (Score 1) 327

by evil_pb (#6163477) Attached to: Linux Rocket Blasts Off This Fall
I'll see what I can dig up, it's been a while since I've done much with antennas.

However being a guided rocket, you should have a relatively good idea of where it is, ya? Especially if you can launch near a wind profiler which updates with 5 minute upper-atmosphere wind data, you should be able to compute a pretty close trajectory from the ground even with wind correction. If it's a guided rocket and you have two way communication with it, you might even be able to update it mid-flight with current wind data and let it correct it's own flight - would be an interesting way to test your navigation algorithms actually.

Anyway my point is (hey I'm into this stuff too, my mind tends to wander on cool tangents sometimes) you should have a pretty good idea of where this thing is going to end up as it moves. Assuming you don't need +/- 1-2 degree accuracy (which you won't, your antennas will be wider than that) you should be able to track it with your ground station very easily. Unless something goes catastrophically wrong there won't be super-rapid changes in it's ground relative position so just put a lightweight ground antenna on a semi-quick motorized base, tie it up to what should be a simple tracking app (hell I can make a perl script to do that), and you're set...

If you really want to get cool, have it measure signal strength as it moves and adjust for the peak... But that's a lot more work. :)

If a 6600 used paper tape instead of core memory, it would use up tape at about 30 miles/second. -- Grishman, Assembly Language Programming

Working...