LLMs can't do interactive work. At best it can form-fill. If the phone call is a straight forward process request it'll work, but as soon as a problem arises it'll go down the toilet.
Customer Support jobs will be back in human hands or the companies will go out of business.

Capitalism at its finest!

Yeah, this. I prompted just a couple days ago for an example code gen of bit-bashing SD 4-bit SD mode and got garbage. Told it to use the specs from SD Association too.

If these LLMs can't see something to regurgitate then they're useless. There's no intelligence. They're just the new search engine is all.

The reality is AI is shit and these kids can see that plain and simple. All these bosses salivating at sacking everyone are wreaking their businesses and in 4 years will be out of business.

So a yes then.

is USA, then?

Credit cards predate even cellphones. Having handheld devices for job management also predates the Internet. As you say, they add tech as they choose.

Cellphones definitely had an impact but Internet not so much. We've swapped yellow pages for a search engine. Big whoopee.

The LLM can and will make a mess all on its own. There is no need for external malice to get screwed by the LLM.

It's always gusting somewhere. Especially when the North Sea is right on the doorstep.

Accidentally, it happened post-WW2 due to smog cover over lots of the northern hemisphere creating a mini-cold period in the 1950s/60s. It was a disaster for Africa.

The question becomes what are LMMs good at? Open public uses seem quite limited because of misinformation corrupting the data sources. Search is one effective use.

They are being used in closed environments like for GPs where the data input is clean and note-taking, transcribing, form-filing, summarising are all time savers.

I can't see trillions of dollars in LLMs. The spend is insane. Google might be the only sane player on the field.

Yeah, stupid headline. The whole point of the label "Dark Energy" is it's a filler for an unknown that still needs to be explained.

No, they want everyone to be used and tracked.

A good example of this market mechanism occurred recently with lithium battery tech. Lithium-Cobalt (3.6 Volt per cell) classed chemistries have reigned since their commercialisation in the 1990's. I don't know it's patent history.

In the early 2000's a far more rugged chemistry (One that doesn't spontaneously combust) classed as Lithium-Phosphate (3.2 Volt per cell) was developed and heavily patented. It never gained any popularity until just recently - Immediately following the expiry of the patents.