Welcome to the latest insanity of our AI overlords. Hot on the heels of SMRs being touted as cost effective.

is be a copy cat.

A big part of an analyst's job is to summarise. That's an entirely different job to coding, scripting and puzzle making.

It's just extensions. M$ doesn't have any skin in this.

In other words, each State to itself. I doubt that's a big factor. Services are expensive all round. Roading costs are skyrocketing too.

engines now live.

You might be thinking of the Xbox360. Nvidia wasn't playing with M$ by then.

The Nvidia complaint was simple enough, M$ had forced Nvidia to lose money on their GPU supply.

Whoever trained the LLM is the one that knowingly stole the IP. If you end up in court over something then be sure to bill OpenAI for the experience.

Nvidia got pissy, leaving AMD to make the terms. Which was probably beneficial for both. M$ needed brought to heel, especially back then.

And they're talking about 24.10 in future tense! When was this written?

So it was a Doxxing then. Do the company execs go to jail now for the burden they've put on society?

It's the whole funding and research models employed is what's the clickbait. It was contrived to show bullshit alone. There's nothing to actually study.

And then people wonder why we keep poo-pooing LLMs as the piece of shit they really are.

Their dominance was in the PC. Intel, like M$, grew on the back of the PC and while that was the biggest source of income for any semiconductors there wasn't any challenger. Problem is, another source of income, smartphones, grew to be bigger than the PC, and Intel didn't dominate that.

Intriguingly, if AMD had stuck with in-house manufacturing itself then it wouldn't be in a position to challenge Intel right now so Intel would be much better off still using its older fabs.

> The US is a majority of the English-language world.

I suspect India and decent chunks of Europe and Africa might want to lay claim to fluent speaking and writing in English too. Albeit as a second language.