What part of "Congress shall make no law..." don't you understand? That these "federal laws" are even on the books is just proof of how far we've strayed from constitutional government. That everything nowadays is just wedged under the "commerce clause" is the tip of the Hindenburg.
Slashdot videos: Now with more Slashdot!
We've improved Slashdot's video section; now you can view our video interviews, product close-ups and site visits with all the usual Slashdot options to comment, share, etc. No more walled garden! It's a work in progress -- we hope you'll check it out (Learn more about the recent updates).
If you were playing the original doom and heretic, I kinda doubt you're a millennial, unless your parents thought doom was appropriate for under 12-year-olds or you couldn't find anything newer to play by 1998...
> everything you do pre-calculus is pretty trivial
Which is really sad for those who don't believe in made-up infinitesimals...
Pretty odd that the "outsiders" could pick out and favor the girls without knowing anything about them, even which name goes with which paper.
Of course, it could be down to better hand-writing by the girls, but hey. Handwriting (communication) is very important even in STEM pursuits.
... against all enemies foreign AND DOMESTIC. You can throw out the corrupted implementation and keep the founding document quite easily. Maybe minus a couple hundred of the latter amendments. (minus 3 or so good ones: equal rights for women and race, Miranda etc.)
That part -- mating the materials with the intended purpose -- is the "art" in architecture. The "art" in programming (aside from some limited domains like UX or AI) is less immediately describable except by effect (e.g. "How quickly do new team members get up to speed?") but should be no less important to any project manager. I don't really think that programming has been around long enough for us to have our Frank Lloyd Wright moment, but that is no reason to ignore the "intangibles" and immeasurable aspects to quality code.
Pretty thin considering the article talks about observed planets exceeded one expected number of planets model and also discusses *other sources* of planets...
Clearly the median planets per star for stars with at least 1 planet is a lot higher than the "avg" per all stars.... lies damn lies and statistics.
Sheesh. So is this the simple explanation to "dark matter" problems in cosmology?
I'm pretty sure this guy's network ISN'T a common carrier. (read he's on a private network, which requires credentials and is for a specific, likely corporate or campus, purpose)
Wifi is so totally secure:
I mean... Where would I find someone who knows how to crack the mighty WPA2-PSK you probably use to secure your whole network?
How could you possibly think any wireless communications are secure anywhere? *especially* blue-tooth and WiFi.
Oh yeah. Bring up phones. Those land-lines have REALLY gotten more reliable and useful in the last 60 years haven't they? I mean, look at the horrible phone track records for emergency service and reliability in 1954 after all.
> It's exactly the same calculation for anything anybody calls a 'natural monopoly'. Absent an interfering government, the money flows to the best service provider.
I suppose that's why municipal water is so expensive, unreliable and horrible in the US, whereas such an "incredibly difficult" service as data transfer works cheaply and flawlessly under the wonderfully popular and incredibly excellent Comcat, Verizon et al. "services". </puke>
oh, so I should sit on the magnet and spin?
Oh, so we're clear... you are an upside-down Science is my God nut. Meta-physics (one little branch of philosophy) is responsible for pretty much every branch of scientific inquiry you're fond of... and that's just the philosophical pinky flexing.
Let me know when your experiments are done growing your own brain in a vat with perfect forward predictability and you're able to "prove" the universe is the never changing holographic crystal you always thought it was in the first place...
You know, as opposed to something a bit more chaotic and interesting that us mere mortals can never quite get a complete handle on...
> For some people it is downright emotionally difficult.
Actually... for everyone it ALWAYS is. That's the nature of world-view.
It's just that, it's often very difficult to understand someone else well enough to know enough about their world-view to put it in any kind of real jeopardy. (ie: discomfort)
In fact. It's actually a personal attack to begin tearing apart someone's understanding of the world when they aren't interested and don't want to participate.
Part of why so many folks get fired up about what should/shouldn't be presented to young students and how it should be offered up.