Become a fan of Slashdot on Facebook

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
For the out-of-band Slashdot experience (mostly headlines), follow us on Twitter, or Facebook. ×

Comment: Fortify SCA (Score 2) 88 88

in my day job I work for Fortify. You can contact the developers of this library and request that they use static analysis product on their software, or request a security review from a 3rd party. We would for sure catch those SQL injections and more. But we would need the original source code. You can probe for things from the binary, but the results don't come back in a way that is very actionable for the developers. As for your predicament: I think you would be better off writing your own library, rather than putting the insecure one to work.
Security

+ - Security review summary of NIST SHA-3 round 1-> 1 1

FormOfActionBanana writes: "The security firm Fortify Software has undertaken an automated code review of the NIST SHA-3 round 1 contestants' (previously Slashdotted) reference implementations. After a followup audit, the team is now reporting summary results.

According to the blog entry, "This just emphasizes what we already knew about C, even the most careful, security conscious developer messes up memory management."

Of particular interest, Professor Ron Rivest's (the "R" in RSA) MD6 team has already corrected a buffer overflow pointed out by the Fortify review. Bruce Schnier's Skein, also previously slashdotted came through defect free."

Link to Original Source

Work smarter, not harder, and be careful of your speling.

Working...