Forgot your password?

typodupeerror
Education

Damning Release of Heartland Institute Documents Reveals Opposition to Science->

Submitted by
bheerssen
bheerssen writes "The Heartland Institute — a self-described "think tank" that actually serves in part as a way for climate change denialism to get funded — has a potentially embarrassing situation on their hands. Someone going by the handle "Heartland Insider" has anonymously released quite a few of what are claimed to be internal documents from Heartland, revealing the Institute’s strategies, funds, and much more."
Link to Original Source

Comment: Re:Interesting headline change (Score 1) 218

by dmbasso (#38974441) Attached to: Labor Activist: Apple May Be Terrible, But All Others Are Worse

Indeed, I think you are correct. But then, as an individual that work with technology I don't have any choice (that I'm aware of... do you know any alternative?). But for a company that makes *billions of dollars* in fucking PROFITS, things are much different.

Delusional people may believe that free market and "voting with my money" can change things, but with companies with hundreds of billions of dollars in fat to burn and all of them with the same policies, nothing can ever change.

Comment: Re:Interesting headline change (Score 1) 218

by dmbasso (#38973905) Attached to: Labor Activist: Apple May Be Terrible, But All Others Are Worse

Yep, something along the lines "I'm paying the rapist, but because the murderer is worse". No, you should not be dealing with criminals in the first place.

[Message for the deeper-interpretation-impaired: this is just an exaggerated analogy to make the point clearer, I'm not saying anybody is a criminal.]

Comment: Re:gazillion dollar counter prize (Score 1) 324

by dmbasso (#38930401) Attached to: $100,000 Prize: Prove Quantum Computers Impossible

By religious archaeologists? :p
But seriously, watch Zeitgeist or Religulous, and see some archaeological evidence that the foundation for the new testament was a copy and paste with some edits from Egyptians&co. some 3k years before.

At least if the people who call themselves Christians really followed what Jesus supposedly said, it would be really nice. But then you see super-fuckingly-rich Mitt Romney (I bet the camel will pass through the eye of the needle) and his company lobbying for laws to pay even less taxes, or Newt Gingrich condemning homosexuals for trying "to break the sanctity of marriage" (if there was a God of Irony, Newt killed it of laughing) or saying "[...] the enemies of America, kill them!", followed by a standing ovation of his Christian audience. Hypocrisy FTW!

Comment: Re:A gazillion dollar prize (Score -1, Offtopic) 324

by dmbasso (#38927691) Attached to: $100,000 Prize: Prove Quantum Computers Impossible

You must read the holy book believing, and you will feel it is the word of god! The rapes? The commands to murder? Nah, that are only metaphors, when you read it you will fell the true message of love, and therefore it can only be "His" writings.

Done, now give me my gazillion dollars please.

Comment: Re:Electric Charging Stations (Score 1) 284

But how can you explain the awful advertisement? Stupidity? Yeah perhaps, but not likely, as it was completely unprecedented. For me the advertisement felt just like 'The Ring'.
Or GM's refusal to sell the EV-1, even when people insisted on buying it? Or the counter advertisement to the 40000 interested in buying it?
Or GM buying the rights of a better battery technology just to later sell it to fucking Texaco???? (this one doesn't make sense at all, if you are trying to see from the engineering PoV).

Or the change of focus from a proven technology (the EV-1 worked, and the people who leased them were pretty satisfied) to the hydrogen fuel cell that isn't even realistic probably for more ten to fifteen years?

If you (or anyone reading) have the patience to explain to me, I would really appreciate.

Comment: Re:Electric Charging Stations (Score 1) 284

Watch the fucking documentary before saying shit please. Then you can contest the specific arguments. 'THEY', as you wrote, are explicitly exposed, with the reasoning for 'THEIR' actions.

I was about to write some of the arguments presented in the documentary, but what for? In your mind I'm a conspiracy theorist, and no evidence would prove otherwise.

Hempstone's Question: If you have to travel on the Titanic, why not go first class?

Working...