Catch up on stories from the past week (and beyond) at the Slashdot story archive

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror

Comment: Re:Uhmmm... presvered skin? (Score 1) 99

by deets52 (#37817500) Attached to: German Paleontologists Find a 'Near-Perfect' Dinosaur Fossil

Also.... "loaned" to a museum? For crying out loud, why? Give it to them, sell it to them, or whatever...

The reason is very simple. If you loan it to them then they can't turn around and sell the parts off to make money (fund raising) or decide its not worth the time and just throw it away or do anything that might destroy it. You will basically not get it back unless they say they no longer want it, then you find another museum who might want it.

Comment: Disintegrator (Score 1) 1016

by deets52 (#37567532) Attached to: Ask Slashdot: Best Way To Destroy Hard Drives?
The Gov't method for getting rid of devices - Disintergrator.

For personal use (i.e. free as in beer, and easy) I found that encrypting a drive is much faster than wiping a drive. Take Truecrypt and encrypt the drive with a very long passphrase - 60 to 64 characters. Some software allows you to wipe out the encryption key, basically making the drive a brick - which is a better option (with no key to crack it is almost impossible to recover).

Comment: Re:Yeah, class warfare. That's right. (Score 1) 2115

by deets52 (#37446536) Attached to: White House Proposes "Wealthy Tax"

Warren buffet claims that he pays less in taxes than his executive secretary does.

Sure he does - he has many more tax lawyers and accountants then she does - DUH!

If Warren Buffet really wanted the rich to pay more then maybe he should pay all his back tax bills instead of fighting them in court. I mean, I am I the only person who thinks he's being a little bit more than hypocritical when he talks about *the rich* need to pay more taxes when he and his company have teams of accountants and lawyers fighting his tax bills on a regular basis?

Comment: Re:How he got caught. (Score 1) 339

by deets52 (#37122462) Attached to: Fired Techie Created Virtual Chaos At Pharma Co.

I know for certain that if I were to do something like this, I would NOT use an installed operating system, and I would MOST CERTAINLY not use a Windows system! Not even from a public computer, from a library, or senior citizen's center!

Why not?
1. Use a Windows system
2. Do something like that
3. Boot up to DBAN
4. ???
5. Profit!

Comment: Re:Scene from Jurassic Park (Score 1) 228

by deets52 (#37108890) Attached to: Digital Tech and the Re-Birth of Product Placement

Lex: "It's a Unix System, conforming to the Single Unix Specification of the Open Group! Unix is a registered trademark of the Open Group, and not to be used as a generic term! I know this!"

More like: "It's a Unix System, I know this custom program that they were onsite creating (with over a million line of code - for dramatic effect!) and still to this day are debugging, even though the devolopers are not 100% sure how it will act."

That's what I say now whenever asked about any program, no matter how complex or obscure it is as long as it's on Windows... "It's a Windows system... I know this".

Comment: Re:Uh, SSL? (Score 1) 338

by deets52 (#37023970) Attached to: ISPs Will Now Be Copyright Cops
Usenet (news groups) that supports binaries with SSL. Several things about this. You are not sharing, just leeching. ISP can't see into the traffic and MAFIAA can't get you're IP address - unless they are running the Usenet. Thats the good. The bad - It's not free - not too expensive but still not free. Lots of viruses in exe files, however that can be mitigated.
The main advantage is that you are not sharing files. You just choose which ones you want to download. The *AA can't hit you for making them available (hence their bad accounting).

Comment: Re:Beg to differ... (Score 1) 338

by deets52 (#37023654) Attached to: ISPs Will Now Be Copyright Cops
I was testing some packet captures one day and I was getting my ID/Pass from Outlook no problem (I mean it is plaintext, after all). I could not seem to get my wifes from her PC - I already know her ID/Pass (as she does mine) so no, I was not spying on her. I found the packets however, I hate to admit, it took a few minutes to realize the problem. She uses Thunderbird and I was using Outlook. Thunderbird uses base64 encoding which obfuscates the information by default (will revert to plaintext if base 64 is not accepted) and Outlook defaults to plain text. While this is not secure by any means since it is only encoded and not encrypted, but it is a step in the right direction. The whole point to this rambling is that many, or some, times there are protections in place, however you're only secure as the weakest link (in this case the end users software). The other take away is that Mozilla is more secure than M$ - and no, I didn't say they were secure, just a little more than the other guy.
Having said that, yeah, I agree more ISP are not really that secure. They are stuck in the mentality of "the traffic never leaves our network" so they think it is safe. I guess they have never heard of bad employees.

Comment: Re:Old hardware (Score 1) 210

by deets52 (#36999836) Attached to: <em>Doom 3</em> Source Code To Be Released This Year
I still have my Personal Netware software we used for Doom (and Hexen, ROTT, etc). Speaking of Hexen - I had some good times turning people into chickens. I just can't seem to let go of that Personal Netware software, I have the box and everything (except the cables). I guess I could get my old PC's out and load my old Doom Diskettes and relive my old LAN party days (before there were actual "LAN Parties") I might have to dust off the old Axis and Allies game as well and go get a case of Dew.

Comment: Re:What's wrong with IT? (Score 1) 214

by deets52 (#36974878) Attached to: What 'Consumerization of IT' Really Means For IT
WOW, let me guess... you never worked in IT (or any service position before). I would have to guess you're more on the sales side of things by your post (hint: point #2 gave it away).
I was going to reply to each of your points but after reading your 2nd point I realized it was not worth it as you would never be able to understand the logic behind corporate governance or IT security policies.
I will, however, leave you with the following since this would be as good a place as ever to try to get you started in the right direction.

It seems that many IT departments see themselves as a law unto themselves, dictating to users what they can and can't do.

No, it's the IT departments job to execute the policies dictated by the executive managment. This is done to better secure the environment.

Pay attention to your customers and give them what they want.

Wrong again (unless you're in sales like you). Give them what they NEED to do their job.

You see things like many IT customers. "You're here to serve me". That is, of course, incorrect. IT is there to serve the business. Hate to tell you, but it really is about more than just you most of the time.

After any salary raise, you will have less money at the end of the month than you did before.

Working...