Slashdot videos: Now with more Slashdot!

View

Discuss

We've improved Slashdot's video section; now you can view our video interviews, product close-ups and site visits with all the usual Slashdot options to comment, share, etc. No more walled garden! It's a work in progress -- we hope you'll check it out (Learn more about the recent updates).

Check out Videos

Comment: Re:good bye to US datacenters (Score 1) 406

by deep44 on Tuesday February 24, 2015 @03:09PM (#49121293) Attached to: NSA Director Wants Legal Right To Snoop On Encrypted Data

If I'm encrypting my data with my own keys, how exactly, other than brute force, is the NSA going to get access to the data?

By classifying you as a terrorist and using torture to extract whatever information they need to decrypt the data.

2015

2013

Comment: Bottom line: (Score 2) 362

by deep44 on Thursday July 25, 2013 @11:24AM (#44382425) Attached to: NSA Still Funded To Spy On US Phone Records

Our elected officials have failed us.

Comment: Well.. (Score 4, Funny) 76

by deep44 on Tuesday July 09, 2013 @05:08PM (#44231331) Attached to: New Atomic Clock Could Redefine the Second

All I can say is.. it's about time!

Comment: Re:Really? (Score 5, Insightful) 491

by deep44 on Monday July 08, 2013 @08:28AM (#44215131) Attached to: Snowden Claims That NSA Collaborated With Israel To Write Stuxnet Virus

At this point, I'd say he's proven himself to be a credible source. Confirming something that was already believed to be true doesn't change that, or make it any less true.

Comment: Re:A classic case of a kettle calling the pot blac (Score 5, Insightful) 170

by deep44 on Sunday April 14, 2013 @10:55AM (#43446223) Attached to: Guantanamo Hearings Delayed as Legal Files Vanish

If another country treated an American citizen like this, it would be regarded as a hostage crisis.

2013

2006

Comment: Weak. (Score 1, Informative) 459

by deep44 on Sunday June 11, 2006 @03:07AM (#15512031) Attached to: The Living Dilbert?

I can't believe how many people fall for this sort of thing. The parent is quite obviously a troll - he switches from being a hiring manager at some point in the past ('used to be a hiring manager ..') to currently working for a company that discriminates against ex-military applicants ('we actively discriminate ..').

Additionally, just reading the first paragraph, it's quite obvious the poster re-worded things quite a bit -- too many extra words.

All that, plus he's posting a very controversial opinion as an AC .. yep- troll. Nice try, though.