Please create an account to participate in the Slashdot moderation system

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror

Slashdot videos: Now with more Slashdot!

  • View

  • Discuss

  • Share

We've improved Slashdot's video section; now you can view our video interviews, product close-ups and site visits with all the usual Slashdot options to comment, share, etc. No more walled garden! It's a work in progress -- we hope you'll check it out (Learn more about the recent updates).

×

Comment: Another thought in this space (Score 1) 677

For folks interested, another interesting view on mathematics teaching is in the book "Knowing and Teaching Elementary Mathematics: Teachers' Understanding of Fundamental Mathematics in China and the United States" by Liping Ma. It's very thought provoking. It doesn't persuade me to any particular solution, but definitely gives me more data to think about how we teach people things like mathematics.

Comment: Re:Uh, what? (Score 1) 733

by davidjohnburrowes (#23073516) Attached to: Brain Study Calls Free Will Into Question
That I don't disagree with. It depends on what one considers "free will". I think that without an agreed upon definition of what these words (free will, determined) mean, it's not very useful to say one or the other is or is not involved. I think the original article is suggesting that "free will" is the same as conscious awareness of some decision. By that self-declared definition, then of course they are right that there is no free will involved, because they've defined "free will" as conscious awareness of the decision. Since unconsciousness is not consciousness, then by their definition it can't be free will. I don't have the same definition, so I don't agree with the way they phrase their conclusion.

When the weight of the paperwork equals the weight of the plane, the plane will fly. -- Donald Douglas

Working...