Forgot your password?

typodupeerror

Comment: Re:Risk vs. Reward? (Score 1) 248

by danlip (#43733479) Attached to: Drones: Coming Soon To the New Jersey Turnpike?

The main problem with your argument is that we are already paying for the treatment of the hobo and the gangbanger, and we always have been. We don't let people die on the curb outside the hospital. The costs are factored into the medical bills and insurance of those who can pay. And for most diseases it is far cheaper to do preventative treatment or early treatment. So universal healthcare saves everyone money.

Many doctors declare that they are closing up their practices before Obamacare kicks in.

citation? (and anecdotal quotes from a few right-wing nut-cases saying they will close their practices don't count, because in most cases they won't close their practices (just like none of them moved to Canada when Obama got elected), and even if one does it is just one person, not statistically significant.)

Comment: Re:The best part of the article is at the bottom (Score 1) 553

by danlip (#43721947) Attached to: N. Carolina May Ban Tesla Sales To Prevent "Unfair Competition"

This is not necessarily all bad, since rich people may be less corruptible, since they don't need the money.

How do you think they got rich in the first place? Yes, I know a few people got rich by some combination of hard work, smarts, and luck, but in general those people aren't going to go into politics (they've got better things to do). Some people get rich by inheritance, and they often go into politics, but are generally entitled out-of-touch shits with no idea how to govern or do anything else worthwhile. And then there are all the people who got rich by some form of swindling or corruption, and they love to go into politics (if not already there).

Comment: More than usual, don't want this book as a movie (Score 1) 468

by danlip (#43659075) Attached to: <em>Ender's Game</em> Trailer Released

This is a great book, but I don't think a movie can do it justice. Lots of books make great movies, but this book is great precisely because of its subtlety, emotions, and the mind tweaks. I see how you can get a lot of great action sequences out of the story line but they were never even close to the meat of the book, and I am sure the real meat will be lost in the action sequences of the movie. So it will have some cool scenes but will otherwise be just another sci fi movie.

Comment: Re:And then there's this asshole: (Score 2) 318

by danlip (#43616903) Attached to: Repeal of Louisiana Science Education Act Rejected

my point is that there was never a stupid and successful politican

Depends on what you mean by successful. Todd Akin and Richard Mourdock were both successful for quite a while until they said something so stupid that it ended their career. But I don't think they suddenly got stupid in 2012, more likely they were stupid all along and just got away with it.

Comment: Re:Why? (Score 0) 318

by danlip (#43616857) Attached to: Repeal of Louisiana Science Education Act Rejected

The distinction between a democracy and a republic is largely pointless. The US is a constitutional republic, and "constitutional" is the important word - it means the rights guaranteed by the constitution overrule the will of the majority. You can have either a constitutional democracy or a constitutional republic.

Comment: Re: Why? (Score 1) 318

by danlip (#43616805) Attached to: Repeal of Louisiana Science Education Act Rejected

Perhaps this is is pedantic, but genetics != DNA. DNA is the physical mechanism. Gregor Mendel was studying genetics before Darwin published On the Origin of Species, and many fascinating genetic discoveries have been made just by observing inheritance patterns without any understanding of the underlying DNA. The discovery of DNA really didn't revise evolutionary theory as far as I can tell - DNA sequencing can tell us many interesting things about the evolution of a particular species, and shows we are nearly identical to apes, but none of this changes evolutionary theory.

This isn't to says the theory hasn't been revised - punctuated equilibrium comes to mind as one example.

Comment: Re:Fiat Currency (Score 2) 692

by danlip (#43473599) Attached to: Steve Forbes: Bitcoin Not Money

There may be a set amount of gold on earth, but it is an unknown amount, and the amount of mined gold is constantly increasing. Also the population will (hopefully) not be constantly increasing - if we don't get that under control soon we are seriously screwed - it will either decrease slowly and voluntarily or dramatically and tragically.

Comment: Re:H1B Visas are abused to artificially lower wage (Score 1) 419

I don't agree with your comment on salary, but H1B visas should be converted to green cards after 1 year with minimal paperwork and cost and a streamlined approval process. The indentured servitude aspect of H1B is bad for us all, and we should try to bring in and keep as much talent as possible.

Your computer account is overdrawn. Please reauthorize.

Working...