Comment: Re:For non US-filtered search results (Score 1) 308
The point is that there is no prior case law specifically prohibiting them from doing this. Until communication on the Internet is afforded the same rights as print and speech, there is no reason that ICE, etc. cannot demand a site be removed in this same manner for whatever reason they choose.
Comment: Re:For non US-filtered search results (Score 5, Insightful) 308
That's irrelevant to the general problem. Yes, they are counterfeit goods in this case, but this country LOVES precedent. But where does it stop? Can I bring down a website because it is opposite to the views of Congress? If this is going to be continued, there needs to be strict legal guidelines to prevent abuse of power from ANY power. This is what is worrisome.
Comment: Re:Notepad (Score 1) 545
Seconded, TextMate is amazing, and if you learn all its KB shortcuts, it can be very efficient. At that point you really might as well learn emacs/vi but that's neither here nor there.
Comment: Chicago already has this (Score 1) 75
Comment: Re:Applications? (Score 1) 90
The proof is treatment though, because it allows you to finally rest.
Comment: Re:In other words (Score 2, Informative) 623
by
cslax
(#36160112)
Attached to: Jeff Bezos Calls Sales Tax Requirements On Amazon Unconstitutional
Actually it was the result of Gibbons v. Ogden(1824).
Comment: Re:Second monitors lead to increased productivity (Score 1) 1002
Because having an IDE open to full screen is a terrible idea, one that should NEVER be considered.
Comment: Re:Windows has a button for that (Score 1) 210
And it only happens when you have your windows open.