I don't fully understand how anyone gives in to these companies that take what's already a somewhat premium device, that the end-user has to pay for up-front, then make all the features that you already paid for a forever charge after the fact.
Except for the fact that the DSLR cameras that this is used with never stated in the marketing literature or in the owner's manual that they could be used as a webcam. The utility just repurposed the remote shooting live view mode and made it available as a type of webcam.
I read the above in your post, I imagined a new dystopic hellscape with EULAs on the back page of restaurant menus that have language like this:
And printed in a 5 point font that requires a magnifying aid to read...
I doubt this argument will stand other than for disputes arising from his single month of Disney+ service
Exactly. What relationship does the online service have to do with food served in an on site restaurant? The mind boggles at the lengths a corporation will go to to avoid doing the right thing.
You can tune a piano, but you can't tuna fish. You can tune a filesystem, but you can't tuna fish. -- from the tunefs(8) man page