Follow Slashdot stories on Twitter


Forgot your password?

Slashdot videos: Now with more Slashdot!

  • View

  • Discuss

  • Share

We've improved Slashdot's video section; now you can view our video interviews, product close-ups and site visits with all the usual Slashdot options to comment, share, etc. No more walled garden! It's a work in progress -- we hope you'll check it out (Learn more about the recent updates).


Comment: Re:Why is it bad ? (Score 1) 990

by commisaro (#37835816) Attached to: The Real Job Threat
Yes, there is something profoundly screwed up about the fact that, under our current economic model, it is considered a BAD THING when someone no longer has to perform drudge labour because it can now be performed by a machine. That said, I don't know what the alternative model should be. Just that there's something wrong with the current system.

Comment: Re:No big deal (Score 3, Interesting) 291

by commisaro (#36829712) Attached to: Suppressed Report Shows Pirates Are Good Customers
Forgive me, but I don't really understand the business model, though. If it's true that their own studies have shown that pirates are better customers, this would presumably indicate that allowing piracy would increase revenue. So if their goal is to maximize profit, why wouldn't they want to take this on board?

Comment: Gizmodo was not right (Score 5, Informative) 380

by commisaro (#34421986) Attached to: NASA Confirms Discovery of Organism With Phosphorus-Free DNA
The Gizmodo article, like most of the speculation, was largely overblown:

NASA has discovered a completely new life form that doesn't share the biological building blocks of anything currently living in planet Earth, using arsenic to build its DNA, RNA, proteins, and cell membranes. This changes everything.

That is not the case. The DNA is largely the same, except that phosphorous has been exchanged with Arsenic. Don't get me wrong, this is still a hugely interesting discovery, but it was implied during the pre-conference speculation that this was an entirely separate instance of abiogenesis, and that is simply not the case, unfortunately.

Comment: Embodied Cognition (Score 3, Insightful) 465

by commisaro (#29594029) Attached to: Artificial Heart Recipient Has No Pulse
I wonder what effect this would have on emotional response. There is growing evidence that there is a two-way feedback loop between subjective emotion and bodily affect. In other words, not only does being nervous cause your heartrate to increase, but an increased heartrate makes you feel more nervous. I would be very interesting to see if this pulse-less heart would result in flatter emotional responses.

What is worth doing is worth the trouble of asking somebody to do.