Comment Good for her (Score 1) 125
Our team's scrum master, who doesn't know how to code, has recently become an eager AI user. First it was some python projects to collate project and process stats. Then he grabbed some user story regarding improving integration test cases for a web app, and let AI do it. All raised spirits and dopamine because of the additional productivity - until it hit the Pull Request. There we scrum slaves shot it down due to unnecessary operations based on zero understanding from the AI of the data and logic, as well as injecting substantial amounts of JavaScript code into the web app to effect certain actions - needless to say, almost impossible to understand without spending considerable man-hours to read through it line by line. On the other hand, we also used an AI to check the pull request, which wrote up a clear if verbose report with headings on all the shortcomings. "I'll get my AI guy to speak to your AI guy regarding these changes."
I strongly doubt that she read and understood all those 100K lines of code; I'll bet she just ran it and saw it works, or maybe got AI to test it. We still have the requirement in our org that the human is ultimately responsible for the code, so my approach is that it still should be readable and understandable to the meat sack dev. Your lightyears-per-gigawattage may differ.