It's an interesting question. A basic principle of jurisprudence is that laws should be enforceable, and you seem to suggest that enforcing constitutional protections against unwarranted search and seizure is no longer a viable strategy for the long-term existence of a geopolitically competitive government.

This all sounds good to me, I'm certainly going to try it out, but not sure I'll love getting a notification every time I'm targeted by some decidedly un-American state-sponsored entity

It's perfect until your special lady comes over and the goose mauls her neglected child

the article is from the moving-forward department, which is clearly tasked with the responsibility of informing us that none of the recipients have turned 40 since the time of the award.

Sociologists have long noted the disparity in crime rates between black and white neighborhoods, and tend to explain data through the lens of race, so it's surprising that such an explanation is absent. Whatever the explanation for the crime disparity, I wonder if they'd come to a different conclusion by asking people whether they or their ancestors had trained dogs to attack black people, and whether they were deathly afraid of dogs. Idk about Columbus, but in many parts of the US, people still do this and the historical effects linger regardless.

they crap everywhere and they will attack all visitors without regard for intent to burgle

I think a structural engineering inspection is very valuable, though perhaps it matters more in areas where foundations are not so solid

presumably null is handled differently from false to distinguish between missing values and values set to null

It seems a gray area at best - the World Wrestling Federation lost a lawsuit to the World Wildlife Fund, and ended up changing their name to WWE. Who knows, maybe they could have made WWF in a totally different shape and been fine, IANAL, but on the surface trademarks seem to sometimes go beyond the legitimate protection of artistic expression.

no, it's THE insistence of assaholics to put a heavy accent on it

If you just want to decide whether to take multivitamins, avoid saturated fat, etc., sometimes have to scroll past the established stuff and then past the SEO scammers before you see anything resembling the latest science

nevertheless, recognizing art with inter-generational appeal requires genuine talent, and the ability to manipulate markets is limited by auction valuation mechanisms that are oligarchic at worst. If cryptocurrencies or nft's were to result in the internet equivalent of galleries and museums, then I would be happy to take the chance of becoming the greatest fool - I like these things. But I'm not creative enough to see a path from the current cryptocurrency industry to a world in which I pay a small fee to see a curated collection of interesting creations in an enjoyable atmosphere.

You wear it with Youtube-Socks

Something evil would be a reasonable guess, but I wonder if the answer is more banal - he simply prefers a centralized rather than distributed mechanism of controlling money supply, companies and farmers. Then the proliferation of new cryptocurrencies and the gambling-related bankruptcies would have the nice side-effect of increasing volatility in the few (if any) existing cryptocurrencies that he's legitimately worried about, and reducing public perception of their value.

Only if you know how to choose them. The Getty Museum/Villa in LA, as I recall, makes the point that Getty himself was a terrible art collector, and their collections are insanely valuable now only because of the experts around him.