Forgot your password?

typodupeerror

Comment: Re:What about the IP (Score 4, Interesting) 152

by ccguy (#43508209) Attached to: Ask Slashdot: How To Track a Skype Account Hijacker?

Won't Skype tell you the IP that was used by the thief?

No, they won't. In general companies tell you to contact the police, etc and go out of their way to be useless.

Some months ago I had someone purchase a plane ticket using my credit card. My bank sent me a SMS when the charge was made (usual alert system, they SMS each time there's a charge). I had the phone with me so I could do something instantly. This is what happened:

- The charge was made for a plane ticket on Airchile according to the SMS.
- I called the bank *inmediately* (as the SMS said) to notify them of the charge. Well, guess what, it was a Sunday at 23:00 or so and they were closed. So the bank couldn't help.
- I drove to the airport to talk to Airchile, which happened to be opened at the time because they was a flight leaving from Madrid to Santiago in a couple hours (I was hoping that the bastard was there). They couldn't help.
- I went to the police station in the airport and they couldn't help because I needed a bank statement before they could do anything. Really? I have to wait until the end of the month before I can file a report with the police?

You see - even if you are really willing to track things down and not demand your money back, the other parties involved rarely assist.

Eventually I got my statement, filed the report (useless at the time of course) and got my money. But I great chance to catch the guy was lost.

Comment: Re:Examples? (Score 1) 167

by ccguy (#43410387) Attached to: Google's Idea of Productivity Is a Bad Fit For Many Other Workplaces

So far they're still mostly making money from ads right? What else?

I'm willing to bet they make money from Google Apps. And if they wanted to charge something for an ad free gmail account (not in user domains, just the old gmail accounts without any ad) I'm quite sure they'll get lots of cash, too.

Comment: Simple solution (Score 1) 439

by ccguy (#43247627) Attached to: Bitcoin To Be Regulated Under US Money Laundering Laws
Solution (and business decision): Have the exchanges in tax heavens. Make all transfers bitcoin-only, until you really need to cash out. Not an easy thing to solve for the tax guys, but maybe this time they will bother do something that can eventually be used to prevent the tax evasion and money laundering happening until now with regular currencies.

Comment: Thanks for nothing (Score 0) 523

by ccguy (#43207887) Attached to: How a Programmer Gets By On $16K/Yr: He Moves to Malaysia
Dear idiot who went to Malaysia so you could live well working for for peanuts: You are fucking everyone else you left behind, by lowering their wages a bit, and if you come back you will find a much worse country.

I assume you are working from Malaysia with US clients, of course, not Malaysian clients who wouldn't pay for $10/hour if that what it takes to live a king there.

You are doing it backwards.

Comment: Re:Do you really need ad-supported websites? (Score 1) 978

by ccguy (#43130979) Attached to: Game Site Wonders 'What Next?' When 50% of Users Block Ads

Who would pay for their hosting?

Anyone who cannot afford $30/year or convince someone to host their blog for them for free because it is interesting does not need a blog.

Really? So only people with a proper job with Western salaries are allowed to blog now?

Comment: Re:EU should really get their priorities straight (Score 1) 161

by ccguy (#42939701) Attached to: French Officials Say EU Will Sanction Google Over Privacy

Besides, PayPal is sufficiently optional across the entire web with very few exceptions (beyond eBay, I'm not sure of anything of note that requires PayPal).

Try starting a online business in Europe. There's no google checkout or amazon payments, all paypal competitors seem as sketchy as paypal or worse, and the online payment solutions offered by traditional banks are an absolute joke.

Comment: Re:Frictionless dating is awesome. (Score 1) 453

by ccguy (#42533705) Attached to: The Problem With Internet Dating's Frictionless Market

I've noticed that online a lot of women have insanely high standards, even an average (in terms of both looks and personality) woman gets used to being contacted by multiple men every day so they tend to not even reply to messages unless you're in the top n% (for small values of n) by their standards.

This is true when those women are new to dating services. Once they show up to a couple dates and learn the reality of things they behave quite differently.

Anyway the strategy of (successful) men using the service is a lot different than in real life. In these service you can just prune the women you absolutely wouldn't want have anything to do with and then approach all others. Success is in the numbers. Yes, 95% of women won't reply, fuck them. 5% will give you a chance, so work on those and forget about the others. You'll figure out quite soon what works most of the time, what doesn't work most of the time, and relate what you say with the type of women that like it (which is also a useful pruning tool).

Comment: Re:Frictionless dating is awesome. (Score 1) 453

by ccguy (#42533663) Attached to: The Problem With Internet Dating's Frictionless Market

If you think you know what you want out of another human you're just objectifying them, which is treacherously immoral.

This is absurd. Usually you know what you want as a matter of fact - or are you immorally objectifying a store clerk when you walk in to buy something?

Plus the "object" can also want something from you (or not want anything) which is also fine.

Cure the disease and kill the patient. -- Francis Bacon

Working...