Comment: Re:First Anecdote! (Score 1) 633
Comment: Re:First Anecdote! (Score 1) 633
Comment: Re:But the Wii doesn't even do HD! (Score 1) 255
Comment: Re:Really? The colleges are the problem? (Score 1) 841
Comment: Re:Discouraging Science and Technical studies (Score 1) 532
But it was the government's fault: they capped tuition rate hikes for non-professional degrees. Engineering was considered professional so we got 10+% hike a year while most students got 2%.
Comment: Re:Careful what you wish for (Score 1) 615
Comment: Re:Or maybe they did their research? (Score 4, Informative) 301
Unless you have logs showing hits from IPs that resolve as being at the paper, I think Occam's Razor applies.
But they do:
Update: Since someone asked about my server logs, the answer is: yes, I checked them out. On March 28 (the date their article was published) I did log one request for favicon.ico that originated at mail.longislandpress.com. Here it is:
XXX.XXX.XXX.XX – - [28/Mar/2011:20:56:31 +0000] “GET
It was served with an HTTP 304 code (meaning “unmodified”) which suggests the favicon was already in someone’s cache. That means the page had previously been loaded. The timestamp is 20:56:31 UTC, meaning it was 4:56PM in New York. The timestamp on the original Long Island Press article is 5:02PM.
To put it in a simpler way: someone from longislandpress.com visited my site less than 10 minutes before they published the article in question. I have to admit I didn’t expect the timestamps to be so close to each other, but there they are!
Update: I kept going through the logs, and what do you know I noticed this entry, which originated from the same IP address as the previous entry:
XXX.XXX.XXX.XX - - [29/Mar/2011:19:40:30 +0000] "GET