Forgot your password?

typodupeerror

Comment: Re:Check your lifetime maximum (Score -1) 646

by c00rdb (#39075617) Attached to: Last year, I spent the most on ...
I do feel bad for people who are genuinely unlucky. But 90% (made up stat but probably in the ballpark I'd guess) of health care costs are preventable. If you're overweight and a smoker and drive 110mph everywhere well you have to take some personal accountability as well (not saying this is necessarily your case).

Comment: Re:because we learned nothing from Fukushima (Score 0) 595

by c00rdb (#38986073) Attached to: US Approves Two New Nuclear Reactors
Nuclear is costing a fortune in legacy costs safeguarding the waste, and its only getting worse as more and more is generated. We should invest in deep drilling techniques for geothermal and put $$$$$$$$$$ into fusion research. The problem with saying "oh that was an old design, things are safe now", is that if you amortize the plants over a smaller lifespan, the cost skyrockets to even more than it is now (already the most expensive method of generation, and that doesn't even include legacy/cleanup costs). Guarentee when those "old" plants were originally proposed, the funding was looked at over a 40+ year lifespan. You can't expect to just rebuild the plants every 20 years because better designs have come along.

Comment: Re:The open question... (Score -1) 877

by c00rdb (#38776947) Attached to: 2011 Was the 9th Hottest Year On Record
The water needs are actually far less since none of it is wasted. You could say the same about fertilizer needs, if your traditional farms are using synthetic fertilizers. Obviously growing huge trees like this is currently a pipe dream, but for smaller crops like tomatoes, lettuce, etc it may be far more efficient. Check this out: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Tomatotree.JPG

Preserve Wildlife! Throw a party today!

Working...