Want to read Slashdot from your mobile device? Point it at m.slashdot.org and keep reading!

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror

Comment Re:.bin (Score 1) 29

I haven't read the text of this Swiss law, but if it's anything like USA's, UK's, or EU's laws, then it regulates "providers" and/or "carriers," not software applications themselves.

If you are sending already-made ciphertext through a regulated service, the service won't be in trouble. But if the service offers to encrypt for you, then they will be in trouble.

It just occurred to me that the now-common conflation between web apps and local apps (to a lot of phone users, these two things look the same) matters.

Comment Re:Why does it gotta be a white oak leaf? (Score 1) 78

Maybe ASF just likes whiskey.

White oak has more tyloses and a tighter grain structure than other oak varieties, which cause its barrels to be more waterproof. It chars better. And it generally wins most taste tests. It's just perfect for barrel aging.

Save your red oaks for furniture.

Comment Who pays the insurance for Amazon's trucks? (Score 1) 52

Is Amazon fitting the bill for higher insurance rates?

This question surprised me.

Before we tackle the unlikely possibility that this raises insurance rates, your question makes me realize there's another question you might want to try to answer first:

Who do you think currently pays for the insurance on Amazon's vehicles?

And another: do you think that by Amazon making the choice to deploy an additional piece of driver hardware, the insurance-premium-paying party in the above question, would change?

Comment Teenage me would have loved this (Score 3, Interesting) 50

I carried my Abacus "The Anatomy of the Commodore 64" around all the time, mostly because it had a somewhat-commented disassembly of the C64's ROMs, which included this interpreter. But actual source would be even cooler.

I remember reading through it and suddenly realizing: "oh, that is why IF..GOTO is slightly faster than IF..THEN, because it skips an unnecessary call to CHRGET."

Comment Re: The real problem (Score 1) 211

" wouldn't it be better if the 300 million plus people in the United States DIDN'T need to sacrifice?"

I'm not sure, but I think this song was written *JUST* for you...

One evening as the sun went down
And the jungle fire was burning
Down the track came a hobo hikin'
And he said, "Boys, I'm not turning
I'm headed for a land that's far away
Beside the crystal fountains
So come with me, we'll go and see
The Big Rock Candy Mountains

"In The Big Rock Candy Mountains
There's a land that's fair and bright
Where the handouts grow on bushes
And you sleep out every night
Where the boxcars all are empty
And the sun shines every day
On the birds and the bees and the cigarette trees
The lemonade springs where the bluebird sings
In The Big Rock Candy Mountains

"In The Big Rock Candy Mountains
All the cops have wooden legs
And the bulldogs all have rubber teeth
And the hens lay soft-boiled eggs
The farmers' trees are full of fruit
And the barns are full of hay
Oh I'm bound to go where there ain't no snow
Where the rain don't fall, the wind don't blow
In The Big Rock Candy Mountains

"In The Big Rock Candy Mountains
You never change your socks
And the little streams of alcohol
Come a-trickling down the rocks
The brakemen have to tip their hats
And the railroad bulls are blind
There's a lake of stew and of whiskey, too
You can paddle all around 'em in a big canoe
In The Big Rock Candy Mountains

"In The Big Rock Candy Mountains
The jails are made of tin
And you can walk right out again
As soon as you are in
There ain't no short-handle shovels
No axes, saws or picks
I'm a-goin' to stay where you sleep all day
Where they hung the jerk that invented work
In The Big Rock Candy Mountains

"I'll see you all this comin' fall
In the Big Rock Candy Mountains"

= = = = = =

"The boomers and gen x are hoarding 80% of the wealth..."

Btw, "wealth" isnt a zero sum game it grows and is continuously created -- and I fall in to the gen x category. What I'm "hording" is what I've earned in ~40 years of work. You didn't lift a finger helping me with that work, why do you think you (or anyone else) are entitled to it? It was already taxed -- and the property I bought with that already taxed money is also taxed yearly, itself. If you don't like the level of services the government provides you just ask for an audit. Good luck getting one in California. They will, however provide a lovely "blue ribbon" commission to investigate how moneys were spent and why it costs ~1 million dollars to build a single unit of homeless housing or countless other money-pits that never answer the question of "where did all the money go". You'll get the similar run-around on the federal level. Vote better. Vote for people who actually represent the people who voted for them -- and not some ambiguous "party" that claims the other 'tribe' is evil.

BTW, I'm not a Republican or Democrat. My votes go to I feel is best qualified. I want a representative who will represent me/our community over what ever party they represent. Neither party does that well.

"There simply aren't as many resources and there are more people competing for them."

It's choices. The stats show that choices and an inability to delay every single gratification leads to much higher risk of poverty. Want to avoid being in poverty? Do the following:

Graduate High School.
Don't have a kid while in High school.
Don't have a kid before marriage
Share responsibility raising your kids.

If you go to college, follow the same rules about marriage and having kids.

THAT is the toolset you need to access "resources" in life for you and your family, and pass that 'culture' on to your kids. That way, your kids will have a much higher likelihood of avoiding poverty -- and if they do experience it, minimize it's duration. A good life isn't guaranteed -- but you can stack the odds in your favor -- dramatically -- without a trust-fund.

"average age for first time home purchase across the population is over 40 buying a starter home not a young family doing the same"

I was 30 years old when I got married. We bought our home when I was 38. My son was 5 years old and my daughter was 2. I was still driving my paid off 1988 toyota pick up. Which I still have. And the stats I read place the average first home buyer age across the US at 38 as of 2024 -- but CA is certainly in the mid 40s now. We got our home about 20 years ago -- so yeah, it took us a bit longer than average back then. Our family was still "young". One of the reasons for the age creep on home-ownership that everyone ignores is that a huge chunk of the US (about 10%-15%) now have substantial student loan debt. Again -- choices -- and a failure for both school and parents to instill the need to consider what they might MAKE after graduating and how long it would take to pay those loans back.

And the cost of housing? Much of it is due to over regulation by local and state governments in building new housing and an almost religious belief that home-ownership is a sin.

Comment Friends of Privacy (Score 1) 100

Anyone remember "Friends of Privacy" from Rainbows End? The idea was that people would spam the internet with loads of junk and conflicting "facts" tied to their name, so that googling their name to learn anything about them, was useless.

Now I see the idea has generalized. I wonder if "Friends of the Fire of Alexandria" would be a good name.

Comment Re: The real problem (Score 1) 211

"How do you stop subscribing to things when everything is now a subscription?"

Lower your standards. Pluto TV is free and has a wealth of programming.

" When you have to keep saving for and buying the same goods over and over instead of being able to save for something else after buying something."

Stop treating buying something as permanent. If you buy a $1000 phone that you KNOW will be obsolete in 5 years -- the BEST you are doing is you are "renting" the phone for a bit more than $16/mo unless it breaks in a way it's more expensive to fix after the warranty expires. Maybe buy a $200 phone that lasts 3 years? That's only ~$5. And you get a new phone every three years.

"It's all well and good to suggest that everyone should be frugile, eat ramen, and suffer but if a significant number of people actually did it the result would just be that the economy would crash."

To be clear, are you advocating people just not consider saving money? That being frugal is the equivalent to "suffering"? Sorry, but it's not a human right to have a $1000 phone, have 10+ subscription services costing more than two premiere cable services combined, eating quality steak 3+ times a week or driving a new car every 2 or 3 years.

  "The American dream needs to be achievable for the average man not just the exceptional."

I'm not exceptional and I started below average on the economic ladder. I'm the first in my family to go to high school, never mind college. My family didn't give a rip about school. My entire family were substance abusers. My sister got me high for the first time when I was 7 (she's 13 years older than me) because she thought it would be funny.

Today, I'm a home owner, I have two 10+ year old cars (paid off), two adult kids (one in the middle of college with zero debt so far and the other starting medical school next year). My son (going to medical school) has $70k in his bank from money he's earned while going to college and currently making $75/hour tutoring students for the MCAT (doing about 20-25 hours a while) taking an gap year. Daughter has 11k saved up after 3 years -- also zero debt.

The only advantages my wife and I provided were rent-free promise and paying tuition if they go locally. Both went to community college -- which, btw, was free -- just books). We only had to pay tuition once for our son as he refused our money when he got a paying job at UCLA as part of a research group.

Hell, my wife came to the US when she was 19 with her entire family back in the late 80s (she's the eldest child of kids -- and her parents). They had nothing, too. Yet each one of their kids got out of school with zero dept, all post grad degrees and are doing well in their chosen fields.

You have very low expectations of people. I think it's those low expectations that cause far more of the suffering you attribute to being "frugal" than eating Raman a few times a week.

Comment Re:Huh maybe this Marx guy was onto something (Score 1, Insightful) 211

"It's much easier to lifestyle adjust your way into feeling comfortable on $70k (median household) vs $40k (30th percentile)."

I came from nothing. Almost literally. I was raised in a family full of substance abusers. I got high for the first time when I was 7 because my sister (13 years older than me) thought it would be funny. Nobody cared about school in my family.

I am the first in my family to finish high school, never mind go to collage (did that, too). I rejected that life entirely and the moment I bolt, I was out of it and never looked back. There were a few times I needed to make choices such pay for food, pay for rent or pay for books, for example -- but could only afford two of those. I lived in a cheap studio apartment with a mini fridge that was a dumpster dive find and got by on Raman and $0.25 burritos from Taco Bell's $0.25 cent Tuesdays for a year straight. I did this while working in data entry (brain dead typing).

My wife is an immigrant -- came from Syria in the late 1980s. with her entire family -- she was 19 years old. They also had nothing, but were a much better example of a family that I came from. She was the eldest of 4 -- all have post grad degrees and are successful in their respective fields -- and all in the state of California which does *NOT* make it easy.

I'm sorry, the problem isn't the "evils of capitalisms" but far more the poor choices people make with the resources they have. The only benefits my kids have received is not having to pay for college (other than books). Not that we could realistically afford to pay anything but local tuition -- they both made due by working and saving. Free rent (in our home) and both took advantage of the local community college free tuition -- that knocked two years of college out of the way with zero expense. Son transferred to the local state college and managed to split time between that and UCLA (both very local to home). He's disciplined and only spends the interest he earns (that's his spending money) -- all he makes from work goes in to the kitty. He breaks his cash in to 4 piles -- each one goes in to CD in such a way that he has money back from other CDs every three months (4 times a year). He'll be taking his first and only school loans for medical school next year.

Again, it all comes down to what you do with the resources you have. Our kids are taking advantage of what we CAN offer and not selling their future on unrealistic expectations of employment paying back all their loans for the "college experience".

Blame the students, blame the state for not teaching the important of RoI when planning for college or even how to manage money, blame the parents for not teaching this and blame everyone who tries to brush it off as "exploitation of the workers". It's a load of fly shit.

MAKE BETTER CHOICES. And yes, not everyone starts their life with their glass half full or more, but it's REALLY not that hard to to survive and build yourself up if you make choices that match the resources you have available.

Comment Re:Huh maybe this Marx guy was onto something (Score 1) 211

" Assuming they can avoid excessive exploitation of their labor by the ones who own nearly everything"

I keep seeing this -- but I don't really see anyone mentioning how many of those "exploited" have new cars, school debt and/or $1000 phones -- which strongly suggests they aren't very smart with excessive spending.

I own a home. My phone is over 5 years old and works flawlessly. I own a 1988 Toyota pickup and a 2011 Honda CRV (both paid for long, long ago). With the exception of some "luxuries" I allow myself and my wife allows herself (for me, it's the occasional vanity collectable like a movie poster or lobby card -- and maybe a game now and then) we don't keep buying new things. Hell, I picked up a great copy of Axis and Allies for $10 at a local garage sale and finally retired my 30 year old set that was falling apart.

The closest I've come to buying a new car was that 1988 Pickup I got in 1989 -- with 170ish miles on it. It was selling as used for about $3,000 cheaper than it's brother sitting right next to it with 27 miles on it.

Lets see -- we've managed to buy a house (about 80% paid off), have a son ready to start medical school with about $50k in his bank (he's making $75/hour being being an MCAT tutor and made money as a paid research assistant at UCLA) and a daughter half way through college with zero debt and about $11k in her account.

I'm one of the "exploited" masses, yet somehow I don't feel "exploited" -- other than by an over-reaching state government (I live in CA).

Comment Re:"If plaintiff didn't read her contract ..." (Score 1) 77

I'd be fine with this. Recently Audible removed a book from my library and essentially told me to kick rocks. I'd listened to it when I first got it, and although I wanted to go back and check something in one of the chapters (which is how I found the book was no longer available), it's not the end of the world: it's just $15 they stole from me.

Comment Disability advocate/childhood medicated ADHD here (Score 1) 198

I'm seeing a lot of people with kneejerk reactions, so I want to highlight a points: ADHD is very easy to diagnose. Unlike autism, which requires a whole day of screening and thousands of dollars, ADHD can be diagnosed in an hour. However, when this happens, parents are usually very receptive to medication because it's both an easy fix and they're probably struggling at home for any number of reasons. If you're slammed, working two jobs, stressed out, barely able to pay the bills, and a pill that promises to make your kid be able to get through their math homework without crying comes along, you'll take it. The alternatives like therapy and parent coaching and stuff are difficult to get, unfortunately, and while schools are technically supposed to provide support, that's an issue. The other issue is that a lot of kids that may be autistic are getting ADHD labels- you've got a kid that gets distracted in class? It's entirely possible that they are autistic and struggling with sensory overwhelm so it's hard for them to think clearly, but ADHD is a convenient dx. Finally, there's long been a real push for pharmaceuticals to be prescribed at a young age, with drug reps targeting both teachers and pediatricians. While providing meds to help, unfortunately for them to work out in the long term it's critical that kids get therapy to help them manage their ADHD, and more and more, that's just not available, so it just becomes a band aid the kids become dependent on, then as their bodies and brains acclimate to it, they have less and less ability to function, so you end up with serious issues in young adulthood. So, unfortunately, a lot of kids get screwed because they aren't getting the essential therapies they need to be able to balance meds with an ADHD toolkit.

Comment Re:"If plaintiff didn't read her contract ..." (Score 4, Insightful) 77

Suppose you bought a load of bread at the grocery store. A couple days later, you come home for lunch and get ready to make a sandwich. You find that your loaf of bread is gone, and your bank account has been credited, all without anyone asking you. Would you be ok with that?

If you buy something, it's fine for the seller to make you an offer to buy it back from you, but it should be your choice whether or not to take that offer, not theirs.

Slashdot Top Deals

What this country needs is a dime that will buy a good five-cent bagel.

Working...