The Atari 800 XL beat the C64 hands down, you insensitive clod.

Argument inspired by gaseous dinosaurs:
1) Methane is a greenhouse gas
2) Eating fibrous vegetation creates methane
3) Creation of methane increases your carbon footprint.
.: If one eats less fibrous vegetation, then one produces less methane, and therefore has a reduced carbon footprint.
+ 1) Livestock eat much fibrous vegetation.
.: Livestock have high carbon footprints
++ 1) Decreasing carbon footprint is good.
++ 2) Killing livestock that have high carbon footprints decrease carbon footprint.
++ 3) Waste is bad.
++ 4) Eating livestock that have been killed to decrease carbon footprint does not waste the livestock.
++ 5) Vegans do not eat or kill livestock.
.: Vegans are bad, because they waste livestock and increase carbon footprint.
Conversely: Carnivores are good for the environment because they do not eat fibrous vegetation, and they do not waste livestock, which they kill, thereby reducing carbon footprints.
1) Some people are carnivores
2) Some carnivores eat vegans.
3) Vegans increase carbon footprint which is bad.
4) A person who eats people is a cannibal
.: A cannibal that eats vegans and is a carnivore is improving the environment by reducing carbon footprint.

Every other war? Where was Hitler's body?

Is there a difference anymore? Do they have enforcement authority? Half of the regulators have some sort of enforcement authority that they self-authorized in the federal register. Don't cooperate, let them do whatever they're going to do, and when they don't find anything, sue for false imprisonment. There is an ambulance chaser somewhere interested in making a buck...

I for one bow to our new Nipponese Ninja Assassin Overlords... Can't be any worse than bowing to agents of our own bureaucracy.

It took me a long time, and three colleges to finally understand that college is for the license to get a job. Education is for the skills. Education and college don't have to be mutually exclusive, if you intend to be a professor. Otherwise, get the degree to be competitive, and training to be proficient.

There is no significant difference between the job they described, and a law enforcement innocent images related job.

With the exception that the law enforcement job you at least get to hope you can catch the A-hole who took the horrible image to begin with.

Mod parent as insightful. I also take notes not as a way to remember the meeting, but as a way to organize my thoughts about what should be said next.

Its a lot easier than just blurting out a tourette's like stream of consciousness. And less disconcerting to my managers and peers.

In the computer world, we're all taught to only install firmware updates if there is a real problem because a large percentage of firmware updates actually brick the hardware or cause other unforeseen bugs.

In the computer security world, we craft effigies of people like you and burn them for not installing the patch that causes the security failure. Lets see if I can follow the logic:

1)The patch that prevents me from dying might break my car.
2)My car is under warranty.
3)My dealer will install the patch, and therefore accept liability for breaking my car.

.: I should:
a) Not accept the patch, and risk DYING.
b) Let the dealer install the patch, understanding that he must fix the car that he breaks while doing the warranty repair work, and accept the consequences, up to and including the dealer providing a new car for breaking my car.

Can anyone help me to understand the argument against installing the update?

Sounds like a policy brainstorm to me.

When you don't know what to do put a bunch of people in a aroom that might be responsible, come up with a scenario, and ask the question, "Who does what?"

There is also less likelihood of doing the deal, since the return on investment is so long range as to make it unpalatable to shareholders. Why would a company fund a martian launch?

Anyone else notice the irony of playing a video game to have sex "with real people?"

Got any openings?

Humans, Skinnies and Bugs... I get it... Why didn't the 40 k people get it?

expanded using convict labor. By then adding super computers, and a big slongshot we can end world hunger...

Whoever gets there first, say hello to Manual Garcia O'Kelly for me.

The above will only make sense to those who have read the Moon is a Harsh Mistress by Robert A. Heinlein.