Forgot your password?

typodupeerror

Comment: Re:But it's all physics? *snark* (Score 1) 978

by bmwm3nut (#30039756) Attached to: Why Doesn't Exercise Lead To Weight Loss?
The difference is that the article IIRC had people working at 55% of their max or something. That's really nothing. I'm talking about doing 5-10 minutes at your max. E.g., look at the CrossFit workout named "Fight Gone Bad" (http://www.fgb4.org/2009/05/24/the-rules/). That takes only 17 minutes, and every time I've done it, I've gone so hard that I've puked at the end. So that's 17 minutes at 100%. There's definitely afterburn there. I'd even volunteer to go into a metabolic chamber to show it.

Comment: Re:But it's all physics? *snark* (Score 1) 978

by bmwm3nut (#30038532) Attached to: Why Doesn't Exercise Lead To Weight Loss?
Paleo-Zone is even better. Cut out all those grains and eat like a caveman!

Plus, I do think that the "afterburn" is true (even though the article said otherwise). I eat 3000-4000 calories a day (depending on the intensity of the workout) and I'm still losing weight. As my workouts are only 10-15 minutes a day, I can't be burning all of that during the workout.

Comment: Re:But it's all physics? *snark* (Score 1) 978

by bmwm3nut (#30038244) Attached to: Why Doesn't Exercise Lead To Weight Loss?
What everyone needs to do is go to the CrossFit main site: http://www.crossfit.com/ and look through their research on exercise AND diet. I totally recommend the lifestyle they preach. I've been doing the workouts for about 4 years, but didn't change my diet until last spring. Doing both CrossFit + Strict Paleo, I'm down 25 lbs in 6 months: 6', 175 lbs. Some Benchmarks:

100 Pullups - 5 minutes
1 Mile run - 6:15
I can lift 200 lbs over my head

I could go on but people already view CrossFit cultish, so I'll quit before you think I'm TOO crazy.

Comment: Re:UPB expensive but really nice (Score 1) 409

by bmwm3nut (#29877731) Attached to: What is the Current State of Home Automation?
Yes and no. It's still really sloppy and not well commented since it's still a pet project. Plus I know that it's not popular around here, but because of questions like the OP's, I think there's some value in actually productizing this code, so I don't want to throw it out there to the public just yet.

Comment: UPB expensive but really nice (Score 2, Informative) 409

by bmwm3nut (#29876713) Attached to: What is the Current State of Home Automation?
UPB (Universal Powerline Bus) is the same idea at X10 and unfortunately much more expensive because of licensing issues, but the reliability of the communications is really good. It comes with a (poorly written) windows program that allows you to setup commands and stuff, but because of the ease of the UPB protocol I've just written my own C++ code to monitor the Bus and send commands to do things. I send an email to my house when I leave work, then the software reads the UPB temperature sensors inside and outside to determine when and if the heat should be turned on. When the light sensor notices that it's dark outside, the porch lights go on. When my car comes in the driveway (induction sensors) and I'm not hope the first floor lights go on. I unlock the front door with a key fob. And lots more. Blinds open and close depending on sun levels, inside, and outside temperature. Lots of really cool logic! I'm working right now on artificial intelligence to guess when I'm coming home, when I'm going to bed, all of that stuff, it's just hard because my schedule isn't very regular. Anyway, to get back on topic. I had to write all of this myself because the offerings out there are no good, if you want anything beyond the basics you won't get it. If you're a good hacker, it's worth it just to write a service that can read and write UPB commands and you can do anything you want (there's also a UPB-X10 bridge if you want to use X10 hardware).

"Engineering meets art in the parking lot and things explode." -- Garry Peterson, about Survival Research Labs

Working...