The choice not to take drugs for your own illnesses is really not equivalent to choosing to skip vaccinations. You only risk your own health when you decline drugs, but the community is put at risk when you turn down immunizations. Further, some of the immunizations for things you may consider minor (chicken pox or rubella for instance) can have a devastating impact when communicated to those with weaker health, or who, in the case of rubella, are not yet born.

And the rhetoric will be self-parodying.

You're right, Handel & Mozart aren't right.

I think they should try Wagner. It will be more effective.

I think your timeline is a little off here. The so-called Fairness Doctrine was started up in the late 1940's, which is before Rush Limbaugh was even born! The FCC stopped enforcing it in the 1980's which I think is a just after Rush started in radio.

Reporters without borders is about protecting the special prerogatives of professional journalists. It is their habit to conflate these privileges with freedom of expression. Really this is just an index of how free reporters are to thumb their noses at local law and custom, not the ability of the populace to publish dissenting views. Sometimes the two align, sometimes not.

Good grief - safety pins can be used for torture - maybe they should be banned!