"But a re-examination of skeletons using modern technology
So... How exactly did this bird kill?
Well, I must concede that I've only gotten as far as the POSIX standard in my computer science curriculum, so I'm not as familiar as I could be with system workings at the operating system level. I certainly agree with you that placing hardware specific code in a part of the operating system meant to generalize the algorithmic interaction with mass storage devices makes very little sense.
My understanding is that there is a logical representation of the bytes available on a physical disk (at which level the file system operates), and device drivers and hardware components translate that in some fashion into physical bytes, possibly generating this translation on the fly rather than as a simple bijection of "fixed logical byte maps to fixed physical byte". Wouldn't an algorithm implemented at these lower levels still be able to use the fact that more data is being written at a time to make more intelligent decisions about where to physically place that data?
All Finagle Laws may be bypassed by learning the simple art of doing without thinking.