Microsoft does not own CoD.
Microsoft acquired Activision-Blizzard in 2023, along with that was Infinity Ward, Treyarch, Sledgehammer Games and Raven. So yeah, Microsoft owns CoD because they own the publisher and the developers when they acquired Activision.
They already did it.... RHEL 10 removes all 32bit multilib/library packages from the OS. If you need 32bit libraries, you're stuck with RHEL 9.
All 32bit libraries/multilib functionality was completely removed in RHEL10, having been deprecated in RHEL 9.
6.11. Compilers and development tools
32-bit packages have been removed in RHEL 10
Linking against 32-bit multilib packages has been removed. The *.i686 packages remain supported for the life cycle of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9.
This is likely a move to align Fedora in the same direction since Fedora -> CentOS Stream -> RHEL
I understand that the Coalition for the Liberation of Itinerant Tree-Dwellers has claimed responsibility for the breakout of the 43 monkeys from the lab.
Also OpenZFS development will primarily be on linux as well, which is probably another reason why SCALE will see most of the future development.
Now there's an idea. People have already created social network sites (Truth Social and Parler), maybe with their own email platform it'll be easier to blacklist/spam filter the whole lot.
If we could just put them all on an island, so to speak.
They are all but admitting they are a criminal organization. It is like suing twitter because you are not allowed to call for the assignation of the Vice president of the United States.
I got signed up for some political announcements. It is the worst spam I get. They donâ(TM)t respect unsubscribe. If you say STOP, the texts just come in through another number.
Google is a private firm that needs users email to generate advertising. All email providers are very aggressive at filtering now. O political party get to force a private company to force the party product on the users.
Unfortunately they don't have to respect unsubscribe or opt out preferences due to being exempt from CAN-SPAM. Along with completely eschewing all good deliverability practices, in my experience.
Maybe if they acted in good faith and respected people's choices, they wouldn't be getting flagged as heavily.
It has been at least 9 years since I used Red Hat. Why is there a CentOS? Wasn't Fedora supposed to be RedHat with all of the proprietary stuff removed?
Fedora is basically the development branch of RHEL. Fedora is cutting edge (sometimes unstable) packages and new technologies to test and work out bugs.
Allow the manufacturer to customize the hell out of it, but write into the license agreement that all functionality must work a vanilla install that is made available OTA. That way a user can go into the update menu and select "update to latest Google version of Android supported by your phone's hardware WARNING: ALL MANUFACTURER CUSTOMIZATION WILL BE LOST". When on vanilla, make the latest manufacturer switchover available. If they did this, how many of us would still be on 2.1 or 2.2? That would be the best of both the worlds.
The only problem I see with this is, who supports the vanilla android install? The carriers, the manufacturer, or the google themselves? Carriers most likely will not want to touch it because it increases their support costs to maintain two or more images and in some cases, ie Moto phones, the junk isn't even theirs to control. The manufacturer would be the most likely source, as they have the vanilla image installed then customize from there. I could see HTC providing default Android builds for their phones without the HTC software installed, but I highly doubt you'd see someone like Motorola doing that. And then you get into fights with the carriers because you can load unauthorized builds on the phones which carriers never really like for you to do. Google most likely wouldn't want to mess with it because now they have to provide images for other manufacturers phone and maintain them.
Real programs don't eat cache.
