Related on reusing coax cables...

The original builders of our house had coax in every room (I guess they wanted to watch TV a lot). No Ethernet. Fiber comes to house technical room, but from that point onwards no network cabling. Would have been a pain to deploy a new set of fiber or CAT6/7 cable everywhere, so mostly surviving with Wifi. However, for "trunk" connectivity I got a couple of these:

https://www.gocoax.com/ma2500d

I'm just using them for point-to-multipoint connectivity - had to get a new splitter. I got one next to my router where the fiber comes in and I get a pretty sweet throughput. Even though the bandwidth is "shared", it's actually close to 3 Gbps total across all endpoints. For point-to-point you get 2.5 Gbps because the Ethernet port only supports that.

Well, VIX is +20% today and NVidia is down 3,5%. Did the bubble just start bursting, or is it just a temporary setback when ton of people waiting in the wings will now "buy the dip"?

I agree that full control is the ideal, but I also don't really get the appeal of 24 fps film effect. It seems more like a legacy limitation of the medium, than something that enhances the look. I like to see detail and enough clarity to understand what I'm looking at, and 24 fps on film seems to be the opposite of that.

Agree. We are running at hundreds of FPS in games. Should I suddenly have my GPU limit to 24 fps to create "cinematic" feeling for some weird reason?

When the Hobbit movies were shown with 48 fps in theaters I was thrilled, and was hoping that to be adopted further - but looks like it has fizzled. I sometimes understand that director might want to show things in technically inferior way - say black&white for flashbacks scenes - but that should be a specific effect for specific purpose. Keeping the 24 fps rate is just ridiculous. Granted, motion blur makes it better than it sounds, but just give me the choice.

Maybe this is just because I've been gaming with at least 60 fps for 30+ years, getting Quake I to run with 120 fps on a CRT was darn impressive at the time, and I had early interpolation on my TV with Philips NaturalMotion(tm) so I have never considered smooth motion as "soap opera" - it's just how things are supposed to be.

Grandma just wants to plug the thing in and watch.

Grandma either would have not cared that the UI sometimes freezes ("Oh, it's just one of these newfangled things"), would not have cared about the privacy implications of online requirement (so she would have gotten the update over Wifi anyway), or would have complained to the seller, and they would update the firmware using the USB stick method.

I've always taken issue with smart TVs and their probable accelerated obsolescence. The TV vendors are not motivated to maintain or update the software on old models, instead focusing solely on next years model.

Why would you care if you get a "Smart TV"? I have LG OLED, 5 years old or so. I have never installed any software on it. I have never connected it to the Internet. There were a few obvious bugs in the UI at the start, so I downloaded firmware update and updated via USB stick. Now those are gone, so why would I care about software support?

As long as the HDMI connectors and the screen works, what's the problem here?

The TV still needs to run OS (in LG's case, the WebOS, which is Linux-based - you can jailbreak it too if you want), so if some folks are running apps on top of that, fine by me. If you'd get the exact same TV without "Smart" features, meaning you couldn't install apps on it, it wouldn't be any different. Maybe slightly smaller flash storage for the firmware and apps because you wouldn't need apps.

I have this same problem on the ESTA visa waiver form when visiting US and they ask about social media accounts.

Not that I plan to return until at least 3,5 years have passed.

My understanding is that Rufus uses, internally, the same OOBE option that is now going away.

See directly from source: https://github.com/pbatard/ruf... - all the option does is add a registry key for OOBE.

So hang on to your ISO image.

Problem with PQC is that *none* have been really proven to be secure (not the algorithms themselves, and implementations of course have their issues). Then we get stuff like https://datatracker.ietf.org/d... where idea is that you negotiate the keys with a ton of different PQC algorithms (and one classical) and hope that at least one of them works.

The whole FIPS algorithm evaluation process kinda proved that - and then we got headlines like this: https://thequantuminsider.com/... - and that made it to the final round.

I kinda get the idea behind e.g. ML-KEM (you do not get a distinct, clear result like two primes but the error vector induces a bit of fuzziness in there) and it "sounds" secure enough for both classical and QC cracking, but I'm kinda inclined to believe that at least a couple of these will be broken in the coming years - probably not even with a quantum computer.

Unfortunately, the most interesting parts are actually signatures. What if everyone switches to signing firmware images using PQC signature algorithms and then someone cracks it? Or signing contracts, signed with PQC algo? Of course solution is probably same as for encryption - just slap a ton of signatures with different algos on the same entity to preserve integrity, and hope that one of them sticks.

Be aware that the "Enterprise" version of Teams vs. the consumer version (that replaced Skype) is apparently completely different product.

I had been using Skype since before they were acquired by Microsoft, and still used it to talk to my parents and a few other folks, and It Just Worked (why change when nothing is wrong). So I figured that ok, I can work just fine with Teams at my workplace, shouldn't be a problem migrating...

Except the consumer version of Teams is ridiculously bad. It does not even allow you to have a *contact list*. WTF were they thinking? And yes, I also had these weird issues with cam, mic, and headphones that I'm never seeing on my work PC and enterprise Teams.

So YMMV because "Teams" != "Teams" depending on what license you use.

Seriously I'm tired of all of this discussion of what "filmmakers want," what about what I want? What I want is bright, clear pictures all the time, loud, clear dialogue, and quiet audio effects and music. Call me tasteless, but most of the time I have no control over ambient lighting and need to keep the volume under control to avoid disturbing people I live with.

Agree. I had a Philips Natural Motion(tm) tube 20+ years ago, and for PAL (25 fps) pictures it interpolated and doubled the frame rate to 50. For NTSC, where 24 fps film has 3:2 pulldown (every other frame is shown for 3 NTSC fields and other for 2), the effect was even better because it got rid of that slight stutter and, well, interpolated frame rate to 60 fps.

This was quite noticeable even on the DVD sources.

I was really happy when The Hobbit was filmed at 48 fps, but apparently that didn't catch on. Fine by me, but I'll take the interpolated frames anyway. I hate the jaggedness of 24 fps productions. Yeah, motion blur removes the worst parts of it (run a 3d shooter at 24 FPS without motion blur = looks horrible), but still better to just get more frames.

What I do not get is that even Disney/Pixar movies get rendered at 24 fps. Why in the hell is that? You can render at whatever speed you want, guys. Just make it an option to drop half the frames for traditionalists then, but give me my smoothness!

See Stop Killing Games campaign, but this exact same thing goes for videogames too. If you are tied to some remote server that goes away, game dies even for single player.

Remember how original Xbox One had the initial ideas about preventing game sharing? It only got rolled back because of the noise that caused (and the PS4 "how to share a game" ad), but that's where things are going.

At least the European citizens initiative seems to be going through so some regulation might be forthcoming...

At least if it follows some model of "Mondays and Thursdays at the office". Well, what if I need to visit the lab at office on Tuesday - Might as well spend the rest of the day there too.

If it's some sort of general goal ("spend at least two days a week in office"), I have not so far heard of any org that actually plans (even on team level) what you are supposed to do during those office days. Do you schedule lunch together? Have your standups? If everyone just shows up, gets to their desk and has a bunch of remote meetings the benefits are...what exactly? Goals of office attendance reached?

Well, just watched the new Naked Gun with Liam Neeson two weeks ago. And you know...it's Good. Liam doing the whole "Straight man in wacky world" bit like Leslie Nielsen used to, all the background jokes, heck, even the absurdity of the plot. Of course there are the old favorites like "Have a seat" - "No thanks, I have several at home", Frank's driving skills updated to use EV.

By some definition it's probably woke - I mean, there is no comparable joke to e.g. the one in NG 33 1/3 where Frank Drebin finds out that the Bad Girl is actually a guy (and proceeds to vomit into a tuba).

So, the new Naked Gun shows either that 1) It's possible to make comedy *without* offending half of your audience 2) I'm just too easy to please. But hell yeah I laughed at Buffy references and Clippy popping up in your self-driving car (and that entire scene). And finally 3) Good comedy can also make some interesting points. Not the "smart devices can turn you into a lunatic" bit, but the whole "I want to get rid of my enemies by hacking their self-driving car and driving to an ocean". Might make a viewer or two think about riding autonomous cars. Same as NG 2 1/2 did with their environmental statements.

That change in vacation policy? The real, legitimate notification of it will be in an email from an external bulk-mailing service telling employees to click on the link included. There's nothing in it to distinguish it from a phishing attempt, and employees are supposed to trust it.

That's really up to the (in)competence of organization. At least where I have worked, yes, there are sometimes such mails, but they are very rare. Most often, if an external service is being used (e.g. for employee surveys), you first get a mail from internal address (that is also signed with corporate cert) that says something to the effect of "You'll be getting a mail over the next few days from SurveyPartner. The e-mail originates from @domain.com and it has a link to https://surveybox.something/ou... something".

In my current workplace, I have gotten *one* legit-but-appearing-fake mail and within two days gotten it again but with a preamble from another source telling me to expect such mail.

Just tell the IT department to get their act together.

I sort of figure that their pitch is that AI figures out "what I mean" and you do not need to be that explicit. So you would tell it "Computer, get me the sales report I edited last week".

And it would know what you mean. Because Recall saves everything you do so it supposedly knows what you mean.

But it would *still* be faster to type that in the search box, especially if you need to iterate "that's not what I meant...".

I guess it would work for people who cannot gather their thoughts when typing, and need to do lots of "umm", "eh", "the thing", "Whatchacallit" and the like filler words when speaking.