Follow Slashdot blog updates by subscribing to our blog RSS feed

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror

Comment: Re:Bull-Fucking-Shit (Score 1) 771

by ZOmegaZ (#44522199) Attached to: Encrypted Email Provider Lavabit Shuts Down, Blames US Gov't

Just for the sake of pedantic accuracy, the process is as follows:

EITHER:
2/3 of both houses of Congress approve an amendment;
OR:
A Constitutional Convention is called which then proposes amendments.

After one of those two things has occurred, 3/4 of the states must ratify the proposed amendment.

I say this mainly to combat the myth that a constitutional convention could unilaterally change the constitution without subsequent approval by the states. It couldn't. The convention is an end-run around Congress, not around the states.

Comment: High hopes, for sure (Score 5, Insightful) 596

by ZOmegaZ (#38784611) Attached to: White House Petition To Investigate Dodd For Bribery
The last time I saw a response to one of these petitions, it was one for the elimination of the TSA. The response was written by the head of the TSA. Not to say you shouldn't push the button anyway. If the Obama administration is going to ask for our input and then blatantly disregard it, we may as well have them on record as doing so.

Comment: Re:Victory For Freedom (Score 5, Insightful) 853

by ZOmegaZ (#34630018) Attached to: Obama FCC Caves On Net Neutrality

I hate to break it to the corporatist crowd, but the ISPs built those networks with our money, from government subsidies. They received those subsidies to enhance our national infrastructure. If monopolists have the same property rights as everyone else, the free market dies. And if monopolists control infrastructure without oversight to ensure equal access, democracy dies.

Comment: Re:collective insanity (Score 1) 836

by ZOmegaZ (#34104296) Attached to: 'Cellphone Effect' Could Skew Polling Predictions
Mod parent up! He's exactly right. Any voting system where you select exactly one of N candidates is doomed to devolve into a two-candidate two-party system, on whatever scale the system is applied. It literally can not be any other way. We need to switch to Schulze voting, or at least IRV, to eliminate the clone-dependence hell we're in now. What's more, this is something we can do. Several cities in the US have already adopted IRV on a local level. This can be done from the ground up, instead of trying to do it from the top down. Expecting Washington to reform election law is a long wait for a train don't come. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Schulze_method http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IRV http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Clone_independence
Politics

+ - Pirate Party Candidate Accurately Quoted by Paper->

Submitted by ZOmegaZ
ZOmegaZ (687142) writes "Tennessee has some of the strictest ballot access laws in the nation. Two and a half years after three political parties filed suit, a federal court has ruled that these laws are unconstitutionally restrictive. The Tennessean, Nashville's local paper, ran a front-page article about the subject, including quotes from Stephen Collings. Collings is running for US House in the Tennessee fifth, and is one of the first candidates to be endorsed by the US Pirate Party.

Full disclosure: ZOmegaZ is Stephen Collings."

Link to Original Source

Comment: Re:The business model isn't completely dead with t (Score 1) 362

by ZOmegaZ (#31537796) Attached to: UMG To Price New CDs Under $10

Weird Al Yankovic stated that he was happy for either avenue his customers used to buy music, but his take per track on iTunes was about two cents a track and his take on CDs was about 26 cents- which is pretty major if you want to support the artist.

Of course, if you're buying tracks off the CDs they don't make any more, it's the difference between some profit and none.

Comment: The problem is high costs (Score 2, Interesting) 2044

by ZOmegaZ (#31536990) Attached to: Health Care Reform
The fundamental problem with the American healthcare system is its high cost. That's why so many people don't have coverage, and that's why attempting universal coverage right now is going to cost so much more than it should. Universal access is a noble goal, but far better to lower costs first. This report does an excellent job of breaking down exactly where we spend more money than the rest of the world. My platform is based around lowering costs in four areas: administrative costs, prescription drugs, malpractice insurance, and practitioner conflict of interest. Based on that report, my proposals would lower the average American's health care costs by over $1000 per year, without requiring any new federal spending or expansion of government power.

If I can figure all this out in my spare time, you know Congress has to know it too. Which means either A) I'm horribly wrong, or B) both parties define the problem differently than I do. Which raises the question, exactly what do they see as the problem?

The biggest difference between time and space is that you can't reuse time. -- Merrick Furst

Working...