Forgot your password?
typodupeerror

Comment: Re:FTP? (Score 1) 123

by Wayne247 (#38776881) Attached to: Dreamhost FTP/Shell Password Database Breached

Very valid comment, this deserves to be modded up. Since FTP authenticates in cleartext, anyone capable of sniffing the transaction gets the authentication credentials in full.

That's why it's never, ever safe to attach FTP credentials to anything else.

I believe Dreamhost handles this by issuing a separate password for FTP.

Comment: Re:and this is news ? (Score 1) 185

by Wayne247 (#34020960) Attached to: Firefox Extension Makes Social-Network ID Spoofing Trivial

I can see two semi-valid to valid excuses:
1. The additional server load, and cost associated (electricity, maintenance, less clients per 'unit' served and so on)
2. Impossible sniffing & tracing to debug live systems.

Sniffing the data in-house troubleshoot is a great tool. Without it, you have to rely to server-side logging to capture your issues. If these are occasional, hard to reproduce, unclear problems, then you're in for some serious log digging, not to mention considerable work to request from all your services to write a lot of logging details. And then rotate those logs and so on.

When all the data is unencrypted end-to-end, all you have to do is put a few network capture and analysis tools where you think the problem is, write some possible triggers for them to launch capture and synchronize together, and then voilà, you've got yourself "the bug" in the net, and now you can begin fixing.

Comment: Re:It's all your fault (Score 1) 350

by Wayne247 (#33171926) Attached to: Why Wave Failed

I completely agree with you. Yes Wave had issues (speed, invites, wrong marketing, etc) but the real reason it failed is because of all the morons who couldn't think outside of their limited mindset.

People are resistant change, it's widely known. Try to change people's crappy software for fun. Try to show your office coworkers how to use OpenOffice.org instead of Microsoft Office. They'll probably all hate it, but for the wrong reasons.

Wave solved a metric ton of problems, yet half the comments here and blog posts about Wave's failure mostly consists of "A solution looking for a problem."

Since october of last year, I have been using Wave extensively, every single day, with a group of people. Some are friends, some are colleagues. We have waves for casual chatting, where we just talk and share stuff together, and we have work waves were we discuss projects, and plan work, share files, have meetings, etc.

It's much more effective than threaded/replied/forwarded emails to get any kind of discussion going with a group of people. Emails get impossible to track really fast when several people are all replying to other people's messages. It gets messy. In wave, it's all neat, organized, threaded, and can be moderated. Delete a few messages that were not on the subject, move stuff around.

I can't wait for a stand alone server so I can host it for me, my friends and colleagues.

Comment: Re:Still out of date (Score 1) 515

by Wayne247 (#31949726) Attached to: Treasury Goes High-Tech With Redesigned $100 Bills

Hi. IAVMD (I'm A Vending Machine Designer.)

1. Different size doesn't screw up anything. Modern bill accceptor units realign the bill as it is fed in, center it or push it on one side, and stack them all up nicely and straight.

2. The raised/embossed parts doesn't mess with anything, and the machines don't crunch them more than your wallet already does. We have braille on all our canadian bills, and they're fine.

3. Older machines always need to be updated to new currencies. You might think the last batch of bills was similar to this batch, but it still required extensive updating on the market. It's okay, because vending operators welcome new security changes, as their machines are also the target of counterfeit bills (but not the same time of counterfeiting.)

4. The 1$ bill is a problem not for high value items, but for low value ones. Unless your machines vend exactly 1$ items, the 1$ bill gives you change headaches. Machines must continuously be replenished with rolls of coins to give back to you because you inserted a 5$ for a 1.25$ item. A 1$ coin solves this because it's automatically replenishes by customers on their purchases, and can be used as change for large bills (1.25$ purchase on 5$ bill = 3x 1$ coins, 3x 25c coins. Six coins in total, a good average for change payback.)

5. You guys have a 2$ bill that you don't use. Why? People genuinely enjoy and cherish their stack of 1$ bill. It will never change unless the government force it, and they don't. You will have your 1$ bill in twenty years even when you can't even buy a pack of gum with it. In canada, we had the 2$ bill to use when the 1$ bill was removed, so the transition was easy. And then we removed the 2$ bill as well! Still worked because the next bill was close (5$).

Comment: Re:FAIL! (Score 1) 492

by Wayne247 (#31905530) Attached to: This Is Apple's Next iPhone

I don't think that's what he meant by that.

I think he meant it's relatively complex to take a new phone, and attempt to camouflage it into looking like the previous phone, while it would be extremely easy to grab whatever cheap general-fitting iphone case on the market, and put your new prototype in it.

In fact, it would almost be a better camouflage to use a 2$ case than go to the trouble of building a "fake-3GS-shell" case around your iPhone HD.

Comment: Re:Disappointing (Score 5, Insightful) 231

by Wayne247 (#31434324) Attached to: "Mythical Man-Month" Supposedly Busted By MIT Startup

Not as old as you (in terms of Slashdot readership), but I've been here quite some time as well.

I think that, as readers left this site, editors slashed into the content quality and try the quantity approach. I used to be able to read the site daily and have time to post replies here and there. Now, I have it set in an RSS reader because the volume is much larger to the point that if I miss a day, 20 to 30 stories fly by.

It's not that there are more things to report now than 10 years ago, it's all these crappy filler stories, blog posts about nothing interesting, jokes and whatnot that make this site less and less relevant.

Additionally, while Slashdot used to be where the breaking news was happening, I can now find interesting and important stories up to THREE days later on this site than on digg, for example.

Me and some other people have submitted, days ago, important stories (in our opinion) about a FOSS company that is suing the Quebec government for the right to bid on contracts that went directly to Microsoft. This is being heard by the supreme court right now. The supreme court! And it's not even making slashdot!

It's not too late, but the editors really have to try and voluntarily lose a few percent point of page views in order to bring back quality and, more importantly, fellowship of readers.

Government

+ - FOSS company sues Govt. for giving 722k$ to MS 2

Submitted by wackysalut
wackysalut (722699) writes "Savoir-faire Linux, a Montreal-based company,sues the Quebec govt. for attributing a ~722,000$ contract to Microsoft, without a call for bids. The RRQ wanted to switch 800 desktops from Windows XP to Windows Vista without ever considering open source, without even enumerating their needs. Here in Canada, the govt. is supposed to do serious verifications and analysis about different available solutions for anything beyond 25k$. Interestingly enough, the trial which is held at the moment in superior court, is followed live on Twitter. That's in Canada, but is the same thing happening in your country ? M. Beraud has an interesting quote up on his blog: First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win. Gandhi."
Microsoft

+ - SPAM: Linux shop sues government for right to bid 1

Submitted by
Wayne247
Wayne247 writes "Linux shop sues Quebec government because they went directly to Microsoft for software, instead of going to public tender like they should be doing normally. This battle has been going on for a number of years, and finally reached the supreme court. Here's a google translation, for lack of english news articles: [spam URL stripped]"
Link to Original Source

Comment: Re:There must be more out there (Score 1) 447

by Wayne247 (#31385806) Attached to: Some Newegg Customers Received Fake Intel Core i7s

Did you see a few posts above you? Someone spotted what he believed to be about 3 million $ worth of fake processors on a shipping pallet.

That's en extremely likely scenario. You have this up-to-no-good set of suppliers exchanging large quantities of expensive electronics. This particular part (a processor) can't be easily tested or checked because of all the intricate packaging involved. So they came up with a plan to swap one pallet in a warehouse somewhere while it's being loaded/unloaded from a truck. No one will bother to open a skid, then open a box, and then make sure these are *Still* actual processors. They were processors when they were packaged into skipping pallets, so why bother at this point? Even the retail buyer won't open these boxes if they're convincing enough.

So they made these fake packages with fake instruction manual, fake processor, fake fan, etc. If you were to just grab a box, and open the side of the package without pulling the content out, you'd see what mostly looks like a full set of processor, fan, manual and whatnot. That's why they built this fake fan assembly, and that's why there's a stack of paper. Looks just like the real deal when you spend 5 seconds looking at it from the side of the box.

The universe does not have laws -- it has habits, and habits can be broken.

Working...