You may repeat as many times you want that but you may easilly deduct from the 1st grade conviction that if the earthquake did not happen they would not be indicted and their behaviour would have been considered appropriate.
It's easy to point out the wrong information *after* the facts....
What they said was that the seismic swarm was not indicative of a strong earthquake coming. So, if the population was fine before the long seismic swarm they do not have any reason to be more alarmed than usual and thus they may go back and behave a usual.
That is something that anyone whould have said in a very alarmed situation with people yelling of an imminent earthquake, newspapers spreading alarmism, etc... and with good reason because people sleeping in their cars and living outside the houses do suffer and it is important to avoid such suffering if the behaviour is not backed by any evidence.
we vote for berlusconi because there are no alternatives,
There is an alternative to voting for Berlusconi: NOT voting for Berlusconi.
and I can assure you that this draconian law is not a coincidence, considering the increasing number of corruption lawsuits involving the prime minister, his ministers and his close men.
Better say "most of the parliament"
What it's being made illegal is also personal recording conversations of which you are part. This is legal in most of civilized world, since is a mere documentation of facts you already know by being present.
Third party wiretapping has always needed a Judge consent.