Want to read Slashdot from your mobile device? Point it at m.slashdot.org and keep reading!

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
User Journal

Journal Uma Thurman's Journal: HOO HAH! 24

So, what's this all about?

First, I'm not really Uma Thurman. You already knew that.

Most of the time I use this account for posting messages that I think others will want to read. I am not a troll, just a guy who was tired of his other account.

But, sometimes I'll use this account to point out the lies of the far-right. Whenever I see someone spouting ignorance, I'll challenge them. My style is extremely harsh, because I'm emulating the icons of the far-right Rush Limbaugh and Ann Coulter. For years they have had a good laugh while they told their lies and slandered Liberals. These arch-conservatives forget that the embodiment of Liberalism is contained in the Constitution of the United States of America, and especially the Bill of Rights.

I'm giving them a good dose of their own medicine, and having a good laugh while I do it. My list of freaks is a sort of "opt-in" list for persistent "entertainment", so we'll see just how many of them are smart enough to opt-out.

When someone marks me as a friend, I mark them as a friend, unless they are repugnant racists or something. When someone marks me as a foe, they are "opting-in" for consistent monitoring and heckling of their ignorance.

This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

HOO HAH!

Comments Filter:
  • You get set as a foe because you're arguing style is hopelessly bad, not because of the viewpoints you espouse. =P

    Grunts like a troll, smells like a troll, stomps like a troll...
    • I know, and the style is intentional. I am sick of the right wing using those exact tactics to smear liberals unfairly. I am angry that liberal is a dirty word. Liberalism is what gave us our constitution and form of government.

      I went looking at your posting history, all ready to pounce with some vitriol, but there was nothing to complain about.

      Also, if you happen to read posts that are not specifically abusing some right-winger, you'll see that I don't go into the rabid argument mode. For those posts, I
      • *laf* As a moderate libertarian, I'm probably closer to your definition of liberalism than most self-professed liberals. I think you'll be much happier if you make the following mental substitutions in reading slashdot, as they make things closer to the truth of the matter:

        "Liberal" = "Radical Progressive"
        "God-fearing Republican" = "Fascist"
        "Republican", "Democrat", "neocon" = "Centrist"
        "Libertarian" = "Liberal"

        Seriously, one is so much less angry when they realize all the invective directed at "liberal
      • As an aside, I suppose I've been reading the wrong stories to see your good side--I foe if someone makes comments that annoy me in two-three consecutive stories, and you apparently went on a binge yesterday in the stories I was reading. =)

To get something done, a committee should consist of no more than three persons, two of them absent.

Working...