British Rail did it first with the ATP:
A turboprop is not a jet engine; it's a turbine engine mated to a propeller.
A jet engine produces thrust using jet propulsion (it doesn't even have to be a turbine).
And those wobbly suicide doors are hilarious.
Why can no modern car maker design something with the beauty and elegance of an E-Type or Muira?
There are loads of 1920x1200 monitors available. Looking at my local hardware shop's page, there about 30 different models with both TN and IPS screens from the usual suspects (Acer, ASUS, Dell, HP, NEC, Samsung, etc).
I prefer that extra bit of height and use a 2560x1440 27-inch Dell.
Cut your fingernails
He probably plays the classical guitar (long fingernails only on the right hand...), so that's not an option.
I don't agree. As long as you have sufficient vertical resolution (1080 isn't enough, 1200 is ok, 1440 is great for me at the moment), then horizontal resolution is fine at either 16:9 or 16:10. In fact, at (say) 1200 vertical, 16:9 would give you a more useful monitor (won't ever exist, of course).
1920x1080 is, of course, an abomination for work and I think this is where the hatred of 16:9 comes from. Whereas 2560x1440 looks great from where I'm sitting.