Please create an account to participate in the Slashdot moderation system

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror

Comment: Re:Surprised those edits weren't reverted (Score 2) 108

Nah, you pay someone to deface his page with slander and lies, and have your staffer fix it immediately and release that you have no connection to such underhanded tactics as to spread ....insert reference to slander and lies.

That way, you have a legitimate reason to speak your slander and lies, while making it someone else's fault; and take credit for being fair.

Comment: if any of us did this we would be prosecuted (Score 3, Insightful) 135

by TheCarp (#49757795) Attached to: NSA-Reform Bill Fails In US Senate

It pisses me off to no end that they can just violate our rights all they want, do it for years on end, then....no harm no foul in the end.

There is no scenario to my mind where every person involved should be walking free in the sunlight. Every single analyst, every politician, every single person who knew the facts and didn't turn them in.

All broke the law, all are guilty and deserve to be made individual example of for they are each individually 100% guilty of what they did.

Comment: Re:What does that even mean (Score 1) 94

Don't count on never, this isn't kerbal space program, I don't think that would garauntee you a stable orbit. Your jump would likely be vertical, so you would see the top of the building move forward, as if you slowed down.

Pretending it is kerbal and there are no other bodies with gravity or uneven gravity etc.... your periapse would be slightly higher where you jumped, and slightly lower at the other side, where you would have a higher speed.

With the right parameters for roof size and starting height, you might have a chance at landing back on the roof after a massive 1/2 rotation jump..... I mean, its already a ridiculous structure right? Why not make it wide too?

What is a kilometer or two between thought experimenters?

Comment: Re:Link padding (Score 1) 62

by TheCarp (#49746989) Attached to: Academics Build a New Tor Client Designed To Beat the NSA

Sounds right to me, except for the assumption that link batching would necessarily increase latency. I believe tor already handles asycnronously in most cases and only rotates circuits as needed or about every 10 minutes.

So circuit creation time, generally speaking, should have little effect that the user can see (unless he requests a new circuit through a control app).

Comment: Re:Sysadmin FTW (Score 2) 267

by TheCarp (#49745851) Attached to: Ask Slashdot: Career Advice For an Aging Perl Developer?

I came here to say a lot of this. Especially since, as I have gotten into the devops world myself, and there is a bit of an equalizer in that a lot of the big buzzwords are things that most people have kind of similar and easily obtainable levels of experience with.

Chef hasn't been around so long that there are many people with more than a couple of years epxerience....but its also all done in ruby, which is decently easy to pick up at a basic level, especially if you know perl. You could easily get yourself up to speed, especially with any sysadmin background.

If you can make it through the level of the advanced chef courses, which, seriously, for someone who knows what they are doing we are talking, a few weeks here you could be up to speed with most candidates out there. Which isn't a dig on them at all, its just that, most of the experience from administrative work or writing, running services is directly translatable, its really just a new toolbox to get get familiar with; for someone who can already fill admin and dev shoes, its a very natural move

Comment: Re:Warning: RAID 0 (Score 1) 225

by TheCarp (#49745633) Attached to: Linux 4.0 Has a File-System Corruption Problem, RAID Users Warned

Hard to say but it will happen eventually. I have seen it go a few years, then lose 2 within a few months. Always make sure monitoring works and will alert you if its degraded. You can run degraded mode for a long time without monitoring.....till the next one fails.

They are mechanical, so manufacturing quality and environment will factor in. My drives likely see a lot of shake and heat being on the third floor of a 100 year old house, between the wind, the washing machine and seasonal heat.... its no data center in here.

Comment: Re:Warning: RAID 0 (Score 1) 225

by TheCarp (#49743865) Attached to: Linux 4.0 Has a File-System Corruption Problem, RAID Users Warned

I have been running a 4 disk RAID 5 array for a few years now at home, and did a replacement upgrade a couple of years back.

Overall I find in a 4 disk scenario I lose just a bit less than one disk per year. Maybe one disk every year and a half.

So when you say RAID 0 that is 3 years old, that sounds about right. I would call such an array in serious danger of loss.

Comment: Re:Root cause = speed over security (Score 2) 71

by TheCarp (#49742945) Attached to: 'Logjam' Vulnerability Threatens Encrypted Connections

>The other reason to regenerate frequently is to limit the window of opportunity for brute force attacks, but that doesn't make much sense either:

Lets not lose sight of the fact that, even doing it only once EVER, even if you then redistribute that result to every future machine you build, is already far better than the status quo.

The current standard appears to be "use the same default ones distributed to everyone else". So really even "each unique machine generates a new set once" is a massive improvement and downgrade to the usefulness of breaking any given prime.

Comment: Re:North Pole (Score 1) 490

by TheCarp (#49742717) Attached to: The Brainteaser Elon Musk Asks New SpaceX Engineers

That was my solution too, it took longer to realize it wasn't trickier than that than it did to realize the solution.

Though the solution only works if you assume the earth is a sphere and north means the where the current pole of the planets spin is and not magnetic north. However those are pretty normal assumptions for a brain teaser.

as a gauge of how easy it is I asked my wife since, she isn't someone who has done math for fun or played 1000+ hours of kerbal..... and well her answer was "Why are you asking me this? does this have a point?" Maybe I would have gotten better data after she finished her coffee?

Comment: Re:Mixed reaction (Score 1) 319

by TheCarp (#49729127) Attached to: Battle To Regulate Ridesharing Moves Through States

Why need? Because its required for some other older services so you just assume the regulation makes sense here too because you want them to be the same in every way and you can't admit that an existing restriction may not make sense to continue in a new paradigm?

I see no reason why a person deciding to use his personal car occasionally to make some extra cash should require commercial plates. Hell, I could see a stronger case for requiring pizza delivery drivers to have commercial plates, and nobody requires that.

Comment: Re:Mixed reaction (Score 1) 319

by TheCarp (#49728595) Attached to: Battle To Regulate Ridesharing Moves Through States

Except that isn't the case, individuals are insuring their own cars, and this new offering from the insurance companies is between them and the insurance companies, it has nothing to do with Uber specifically.

In fact, if anything what I don't see is any need for a new law. Existing law clearly already covers it by requiring insurance, and insurance company policies not covering that usage....so where is a law needed where we already have one and already have people working to comply with the ones we have?

There are three kinds of people: men, women, and unix.

Working...