Want to read Slashdot from your mobile device? Point it at m.slashdot.org and keep reading!

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror

Comment: Re:if not collecting the data (Score 1) 75

by The Good Reverend (#48693321) Attached to: Apple Pay For the UK

Any company that contracts out their POS terminals and accepts credit and debit cards (so, just about everyone) can get a terminal that accepts NFC payments.

My local large grocery story (Albertson's, in southern California) has accepted Apple Pay from the start, even though their terminals don't look any different than anyone else's, and don't have the typical separate plastic thing that you're supposed to touch your phone to. The whole thing is built into the user-accessible terminal, and Apple Pay just works.

Stores don't own these terminals, and the companies that provide/service them can either turn on the functionality (if the terminal has it built in) or replace the terminal with a newer model (which happens regularly anyway). It's not a matter of having to run new lines out to the boonies - if they take credit cards, they can likely accept NFC payments.

Comment: Re: Good luck with that. (Score 1) 558

by The Good Reverend (#48250519) Attached to: Rite Aid and CVS Block Apple Pay and Google Wallet

Except that I'm going to have my phone with me anyway - it's not just for making payments (so the theft/damage argument is irrelevant). And I can still lend a card to my wife, and still use it myself. But now I also have a quick, secure option with my phone that's worked 3 out of the three times I've tried it.

Comment: Re: Good luck with that. (Score 1) 558

by The Good Reverend (#48247885) Attached to: Rite Aid and CVS Block Apple Pay and Google Wallet

That article mentions the ways Apple Pay is better than credit cards, then goes off the deep end mentioning a bunch of generic studies about the possibilities of connecting data-mined information to individuals, then somehow implies that Apple Pay is specifically victim to these problems. Troll article.

Comment: Re:Congressional Pharmaceutical Complex (Score 4, Informative) 217

by The Good Reverend (#47793251) Attached to: States Allowing Medical Marijuana Have Fewer Painkiller Deaths

Given legalization is extremely new, the conclusion of the article and study is grossly premature. Making matters worse in my opinion, is that the study only looks at a single element of drugs, and not the complete impact.

California legalized marijuana 18 years ago, in 1996. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/C...

Comment: You know... (Score 5, Insightful) 403

...it's hardly even started filming yet. Maybe wait until it's released to worry?

Or better yet, don't worry. Skip it entirely if you can't hold "sequel" and "rose-tinted memories of the originals" in your brain at the same time. No one's ruining your childhood if you just stay home...

Comment: Re:A couple of limitations... (Score 2) 180

None of the streaming providers like Netflix are just going to "turn off" the old, non-H.265 streams just because one device gets them. And since none of them are even using them at all right now, I'd say we have many years before Netflix will phase them out (if ever - they still have non-adaptive streams and older interfaces for legacy devices, which still work just fine) .

The shortest distance between two points is under construction. -- Noelie Alito

Working...