Forgot your password?

typodupeerror

Comment: Don't do it! (Score 5, Insightful) 295

by The Good Reverend (#42865273) Attached to: Is It Possible To Erase Yourself From the Internet?

I've never understood the fascination so many tech luddites and techies-who-think-they're-cool-by-hating-being-on-the-internet to try to erase their online presence. It'll only come back to bite you.

You don't have to share everything, but establishing your presence and "owning your name" gives you some measure of control in regards to what people find if they search for you. If you go the "you can't see me" route, anyone with a vendetta or anything (good or bad) that gets you in the news is suddenly all anyone searching sees. You can't control everything by being online, but you certainly have more control than if you try to hide.

Comment: Re:Truly horrible. (Score 1) 467

by The Good Reverend (#41663895) Attached to: How Facebook Can Out Your Most Personal Secrets

I guess it comes down to different people's different interpretations of the word "bigotry". Neither American Atheists nor any major freethought/atheist group in the US is trying to take rights away from anyone, they want things like removing religion from publicly funded institutions (schools, courtrooms, etc) and to stop oppression of the non-religious.

For me, removing Christian prayer from a public school football game isn't bigotry at all, but a Christian group trying to deny gays the right to marry most certainly is. I can understand that others see this differently. I don't even think your example is bigotry; it's just a poorly-thought out approach and rude.

Comment: Re:Truly horrible. (Score 3, Interesting) 467

by The Good Reverend (#41653491) Attached to: How Facebook Can Out Your Most Personal Secrets

I assume the same, though his rogue capitalization and blatant lies made me wonder if he actually meant some other group.

Disclaimer: I am a former state director for American Atheists. They're weird folks, but they're not institutionally bigots in any way, even toward the religious.

Comment: Re:Probably adults too. (Score 3, Insightful) 334

by The Good Reverend (#41602501) Attached to: Study: Kids Under 3 Should Be Banned From Watching TV

No, "TV" is a device that allows me to watch visual and audio stimuli - it's unrelated to the content, which is what you're describing. I choose what I put on my television, and I'm sorry if you've only been exposed to the kind of programming you've described.

Also, everything you've just discussed can be said for books (and many websites, for that matter). Are you giving up reading and internet surfing, too?

Comment: Re:Always with the jabs (Score 2) 513

by The Good Reverend (#41428897) Attached to: iOS 6 Adoption Tops 25% After Just 48 Hours

The 3GS was introduced in June of 2009 (more than three years ago), and gets the latest OS (though, admittedly, not all the features). Apple has a very, very good history of supporting devices for an extended time. By the time there's a new OS, the 3GS was be 4 years old - that's an absurd length of time to expect to be compatible with a new OS (and honestly, we don't know that it won't be).

Comment: Re:"PC Makers" (Score 1) 622

by The Good Reverend (#41141793) Attached to: PC Makers In Desperate Need of a Reboot

In before the "pony" comments.

With currently tech, your dream phone is mostly limited by battery options, unless you're willing to go for a very heavy device. More practically and ignoring currently available tech, your phone is mostly suffering from never having a market large enough - your feature set MIGHT exist on a specialized tablet, but even then you'd be looking at a huge pricetag because of the specialized components and non-standard configuration.

Dead? No excuse for laying off work.

Working...