Follow Slashdot blog updates by subscribing to our blog RSS feed

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror

Slashdot videos: Now with more Slashdot!

  • View

  • Discuss

  • Share

We've improved Slashdot's video section; now you can view our video interviews, product close-ups and site visits with all the usual Slashdot options to comment, share, etc. No more walled garden! It's a work in progress -- we hope you'll check it out (Learn more about the recent updates).

×

Comment: Re:These suits against Google are losers (Score 1) 247

by Tellalian (#27984227) Attached to: Lawsuit Says Google's Sale of Keywords Is Illegal

"Obviously, nobody likes it when you give their customers other options. But it's not trademark infringement."

Of course it's trademark infringement. A company is paying Google $$$ to have their company associated with a phrase that's legally registered to another company.

Google allows anyone to outbid a trademark owner to the point where the trademark owner doesn't show up at all. Now, instead of FirePond paying to have their ad on Google, they have to outbid all their competitors, just to enforce their legally recognized trademark.

Imagine if other ad mediums worked this way. Don't want a competitor using your trademark in their magazine ad? Fine. Pay the magazine $$$ more then the competitor. Great for the magazine. Bad for companies and consumers alike, since the company's are going to pass along that cost to the consumer.

I can understand why the plaintiffs are pissed.

"All my life I wanted to be someone; I guess I should have been more specific." -- Jane Wagner

Working...