No, thinking would have told you that you had insufficient knowledge to come to any significant conclusion, and your still making wrong assumptions about the details.
It was NOT a one car crash, there were three cars involved on a two lane highway with narrow shoulders.
One vehicle was a 1/4ton truck that moved to straddle the middle line, that one got away unscathed.
An asymmetric head-on collision would have sent both cars spinning on the wet pavement involving several more cars.
The police said he did the best that could be expected under the circumstances, this with formal statements from multiple witnesses.
Also he was a professional driver with years of experience.
The car that hit my brother, hit head on from the side (her front, passenger side on my brothers car) and the driver of that car spent several days in icu.
His only choices were to do as he did, have a dangerous head on that would have likely killed and injured many more, slammed on his brakes and still had a head, only while sliding on wet pavement with potentially less reduction in speed, or cross the narrow grass divider on the interstate and hit even faster moving oncoming trafic.
Mycroft