Want to read Slashdot from your mobile device? Point it at m.slashdot.org and keep reading!


Forgot your password?

Slashdot videos: Now with more Slashdot!

  • View

  • Discuss

  • Share

We've improved Slashdot's video section; now you can view our video interviews, product close-ups and site visits with all the usual Slashdot options to comment, share, etc. No more walled garden! It's a work in progress -- we hope you'll check it out (Learn more about the recent updates).


Comment: Re:If you insist on keeping physical hardware (Score 1) 443

The poster is talking about a couple of GB, so surely an SD card encrypted if needed and kept in his wallet or car is all that is required.

This is better than any of the harebrained schemes proposed so far.

However if we're gonna go down the encryption route, why not just encrypt the file and upload it to multiple web hosts? SD cards in car and wallet are still subject to loss/theft/degradation, plus if the police ever get a hold of it you may become inconvenienced (because the authorities are convinced that encryption means you're a criminal with something to hide).

Comment: Don't worry actors (Score 4, Insightful) 360

by Spy Handler (#49382867) Attached to: Why More 'Star Wars' Actors Don't Become Stars

Lucas isn't writing the screenplay anymore. You're all safe.

"Anakin, make love to me like you did by the lake on planet Wumpumpsefukit!" (or whatever the hell the actual line from Episode 2 was)

With lines like that, no wonder a world-class actress like Natalie Portman ended up looking like a wooden talentless hack. But actually the only talentless hack here was Lucas.

Well ok that's a bit harsh. Lucas has talent but not when it comes to writing dialogue that doesn't completely suck ass.

Comment: Re:Simplicity? (Score 1) 269

by Spy Handler (#49278165) Attached to: Fraud Rampant In Apple Pay

What, the waterproof lightweight ones that take up less room in my wallet (which I'm already carrying) than a bunch of other items (including cards that lack payment functionality)?

In return I just need to carry a ã500 device, keep it charged, keep it dry, avoid physical impact and not break it?

Dumb argument. People who use Apple Pay were already carrying their iphones around. Nobody is expecting someone who had no desire to own an iphone to suddenly start carrying one just to use Apple Pay. And yes, having one less card to carry around is a bonus.

4) It eliminates magnetic swiping.

Nah, don't do that here.

5) It eliminates signing.

Nah, don't do that here.

6) It eliminates showing driver's licenses.

Nah, don't do that here.

7) It eliminates entering zip codes.

Nah, don't do that here.

Yeah, some people have to do all of those.

Your problem seems to be that you are utterly unable to comprehend another person's point of view. You don't have to deal with x, therefore x must be a non-issue.

So wait? I have to unlock the phone? And that's somehow quicker or easier than entering a PIN? Ok.

Yes, it's both quicker and easier than entering a PIN for most people. Compare 5 or more strokes on a keypad vs. placing your thumb on the Home button. And it's less error-prone (you may be a world-class keyboard cruncher with 100% accuracy, but many people are not and sometimes they hit the wrong key while entering a PIN and have to start over again)

Comment: Ship wake bubbles is a good method (Score 3, Interesting) 319

by Spy Handler (#48770187) Attached to: How Close Are We To Engineering the Climate?

See: http://www.bbc.com/news/scienc...

This method is great because ships are already making bubbles in their wake. We just make it whiter with smaller bubbles. Basically raising the ocean albedo.

In the "What can possibly go wrong?" department, this method is far better than any of the other geoengineering proposals. And it's cheap.

Simply retrofitting existing large ships to produce smaller bubbles could reduce global temperature by 0.5C. If we want more cooling, we could float dedicated solar-powered bot ships that do nothing but cruise the equitorial seas making wake.

Comment: Re:Calling bullshit (Score 1) 220

by Spy Handler (#48768349) Attached to: EFF: Apple's Dev Agreement Means No EFF Mobile App For iOS

Do you actually make a living selling those 99 cent apps on App Store? As in, you don't have another day job?

That's pretty hard. Very rare.

Saying the app store and its execution weren't a great revolution shows that you are totally ignorant of how software was made and sold only a few years ago. Small developers for software really didn't exist. Nobody pays for shareware, and making a living as a small dev was basically impossible. The app store basically recreated the hobby developer market, period, and brought it to a level of mainstream that was never attained by normal PCs.

That's not true at all. Small devs sold on their own website (and they still do). I bought all kinds of Windows software from small devs. A few examples of stuff I bought (there are many others but not all of them are still around):


They have trial versions they distribute on download sites like CNET download.com. If you like it you buy the full version. This model works. Yes there's piracy but if your program (let's not call it an app) is good and useful you'll get many paid buyers.

"Oh what wouldn't I give to be spat at in the face..." -- a prisoner in "Life of Brian"