|
|
"It's not the known things that get you, or the known unknowns, it's the unknown unknowns." -- heavily paraphrased from Donald Rumsfeld
Just a little wisdom from a related field...although many days it feels like they're the same thing...
Oh not again. When will we let that language die??!!??
I programmed in it for 6 years right out of college because the employer was desperate for anyone who didn't value their career too highly. I was only saved from it because I had C experience in school. It might have been a good scripting language if only people thought in RPN, but alas, we don't. One of the worst languages I've ever used, right down there with T-SQL and 4-D.
It's not an accident that "computer science" looks forward. It's because people like to program, and a significant part of the enjoyment of programming is doing everything from scratch. I've met people who will turn their noses up at existing code in favor of writing everything from scratch, because "that's where the fun is".
So yes, we too hate studying the history of old applications because then we'd be forced to admit that it has been done before, and probably better than we could have done it. And then where would the fun be?
NIH ("not invented here") is a huge part of why software engineering is still stuck in the cottage industry stage...
And you expected something else from a state run by "progressives"? They never have enough of other people's money!
Kuhn's focus is pretty outdated now. Until someone comes along and really exposes the effects of grants and funding, industry versus gov't research, publish-or-perish, groupthink, tenure, hard versus soft sciences, science foundations, career/income pressures on scientists, and so on, they won't fully understand science in postmodern times.
Just read
Been around long enough to know that the "best" code is what your superiors expect you to produce at that particular moment. It may need to be one or more of the following: {fast (in running speed), quick to produce, high quality in terms of having few bugs, easy to understand, easy to extend, compliant with a particular standard or standards (coding, security, etc.)}, and probably a dozen more such factors. You cannot optimize very many of these at the same time.
What really stinks is that if your boss or co-workers are out to get you, software is so subjective that they can always fault you for one of the above factors that you didn't optimize for.
Oh, and you'll never get people to understand the above, to be able to use it in your own defense...
Studies (don't have time to look up the Scientific American article at the moment; it was entitled "Violent Pride") show that bullies are most often narcissists. In other words, they bully because their self-esteem is actually pathologically high. They believe themselves to be above the rules, and so can abuse whoever they choose. It's not an inferiority complex that they suffer from.
The traditional story of bullies being low self-esteem sufferers is a myth, and needs to be dispelled as quickly as possible, because it results in all the wrong sorts of solutions.
I've always wanted to stroll down Main Street, Atlantis!
This is different from the magnetic stimulation, and supposedly more effective. It involves putting direct current (up to 2 mA) across the scalp. No holes required! Research is on-going, and you can google for research and surveys of research that has been done.
In fact, I'm just starting to experiment with it myself, as it appears quite safe, as long as you monitor the current level closely. (I have it set up so that if anything goes awry, the current is immediately disconnected.)
Supposedly it is able to affect depression, insomnia, and boost learning. I'd be happy if it helped any of the three...
...and if it's been stripped like the one I saw, don't bother going. It isn't worth walking up the ramp to see it. Just an empty shell. They didn't even leave more than a few wires dangling around. And you couldn't walk into any of the crew areas. Nothing.
...United States...had arguably already won WWII.
"Won" in war means "the other guy has surrendered". That had not yet happened when the atom bombs were dropped.
People need to...do a little critical thinking.
Done.
Hard liquor consumption shot up during prohibition
Not so fast there. I've heard that thrown out before without any justification. Please tell me how consumption of an illegal beverage was accurately measured _during_ Prohibition? I don't think any government statisticians were walking into speakeasies and measuring things. (Gallons seized/destroyed would not be a reliable proxy, I wouldn't think.)
(And I'm sure the government had no incentive to fudge the numbers after it ended Prohibition, in order to justify its decision. Nah, they wouldn't do a thing like that! Nor would any academic researchers have bias here...)
Advancement in position.