Become a fan of Slashdot on Facebook


Forgot your password?

Slashdot videos: Now with more Slashdot!

  • View

  • Discuss

  • Share

We've improved Slashdot's video section; now you can view our video interviews, product close-ups and site visits with all the usual Slashdot options to comment, share, etc. No more walled garden! It's a work in progress -- we hope you'll check it out (Learn more about the recent updates).


Comment: Wording (Score 1) 226

by Shadowhawk (#46338811) Attached to: Google Fighting Distracted Driver Laws

The title suggests that Google is fighting against distracted driving laws, but when you read TFA, it sounds like they are really fighting laws that ban Glass-like devices which, depending on your point of view, might not be the same thing.

When I'm using my phone to navigate in the car, I have to glance at the phone occasionally. If I had Glass active and it was showing some of the same things, I wouldn't need to look away from the road and (in theory) could be less distracted. IMHO, I would think a blanket ban on the device is premature at this point. If Glass is released to the public and the data shows that it causes problems, the it will be time to start the discussion.

Comment: Re:Sockets (Score 1) 286

by Shadowhawk (#45599845) Attached to: The Challenge of Cross-Language Interoperability

Separating the libraries to run in their own process is one way to get the same effect as different libraries with some benefits (clearer boundaries of each module, the ability to switch components seamlessly, and the possibility of splitting components over difference servers come to mind).

Any socket communication using a loopback address would not be an order of magnitude slower since it never goes out over the wire. There would be some overhead (copying the data from one memory space to another), but not that huge.


+ - C++ Grandmaster Course Registration Extended->

Submitted by Shadowhawk
Shadowhawk (30195) writes "The C++ Grandmaster Certification course, the free massively open online course (MOOC) where you build your own C++ compiler, has extended the registration deadline to March 15th. In addition, they have released the first assignment of the course as a public preview for free anonymous download and review: preprocessor tokenization."
Link to Original Source
PlayStation (Games)

+ - Sony Announces Playstation 4->

Submitted by
_0x783czar writes "Sony has today announced their next generation console, the Playstation 4. It is slated to have an x86 based AMD chipset, which is why Sony is describing the new console as a "Super Charged PC". They also hope that the x86 architecture will make it easier for developers to create games, since they will be able to write the code for the same architecture as a PC. No pictures have yet been released to show what this new console will look like, aside from the the controller: which will have a touch-pad and & camera tracked light. This new console will also focus heavily on social interaction and aims to provide an easy way to pause and share video of your last few minutes of gameplay. In addition to this, it is reported to also have the ability to let your friends remotely control your character in game so as to help you get through a difficult spot; or even just to watch as spectators. Sony hopes to have this new console compete with the Wii U and the upcoming XBox 720 (name pending), but many people are still skeptical since no actual pictures of the console have been released. "Pics or it didn't happen.""
Link to Original Source

Comment: Re:Built on bleeding edge technology (Score 2) 138

by Shadowhawk (#39490139) Attached to: Mozilla Releases HTML5 MMO <em>BrowserQuest</em>
I know I'm feeding the troll here, but what application developers has access to threads (or sound or graphics even) in the 70s? First reference to threads I can find is SunOS 4.x, which came out in 82. The 80s is also when some sounds and graphics became available on many computers (Commodore Vic-20, Atari 2600, IBM PC, Apple II, etc). There might have been specialty computers that had those features, but nothing available for the average application developer in the 70s.

Comment: Re:Why ACTA isn't going before Congress... (Score 4, Insightful) 78

by Shadowhawk (#39427051) Attached to: Senator Wyden Demands ACTA Goes Before Congress
What you say may be true, but I don't think he expects to be able to change existing copyright law. IMHO he has two aims; to make ratification of treaties require Senate approval (as specified in the Constitution) rather than Presidential fiat; and requires that negotiations in these treaties be conducted in the open (anything we share with other countries must be made public). Yes, I RTFA, but I'm not new here.

Nobody's gonna believe that computers are intelligent until they start coming in late and lying about it.