Forgot your password?

typodupeerror

Comment: Re:There's nothing spectacular about the Rotary (Score 1) 359

by SIGBUS (#37685032) Attached to: Mazda Stops Production of the Last Rotary Engine Powered Car

I had an '82 RX-7 about 20 years ago (damn, that long ago?!). On the plus side, it was damn fun to drive, the engine was silky smooth, and the car had beautiful styling. On the minus side, the E-Z-Flood manual choke was very touchy in cold weather, spark plugs and other mundane parts were ridiculously expensive, and it was expensive to insure.

The crowning irony: my 2010 Honda Fit has noticeably faster 0-60 and slightly faster quarter-mile times, outcorners the RX-7, and gets about 75% better fuel economy, and is cheaper to insure and seats four to boot. Both the Fit and the RX-7 had 5-speed manual transmissions; the Fit isn't so peppy with a slushbox.

Comment: Google Maps and Firefox vs. Chrome (Score 3, Interesting) 585

by SIGBUS (#37559336) Attached to: Chrome Set To Take No. 2 Spot From Firefox

In recent months, I've noticed that Google Maps satellite view has been pretty hideous in Firefox. Satellite view tiles get updated on a haphazard basis with long delays, and that wasn't the case beforehand. It's just as much a problem on fast machines as it is on slow ones. Recently, I decided to fire up Chrome, and, lo and behold, the satellite views work quite nicely.

It makes me wonder whether it's Firefox's fault, or if Google Maps has been tweaked to work better in Chrome, or perhaps both.

Comment: Re:Sigh... (Score 1) 495

by SIGBUS (#37469820) Attached to: Mozilla Contemplating Five Week Release Cycle

In my tests I found that anything short of a 3GHz P4 with HT is frankly unusable, with a new tab spiking the CPU to 100% and taking control away from the user for up to a minute, more like 3 minutes if they launch even an SD video. That is simply unacceptable, and that is with NO extensions but ABP and ForecastFox, the same as loaded on the Dragon. On the lowest machine i have, which is a 1.8GHz Sempron with 1.5Gb of RAM that I use as a nettop in the shop I found Firefox to be so sluggish it was just pathetic, the exact same machine with Dragon is a fine little web surfer.

Are you sure there isn't something else wrong (perhaps a resource-hogging antivirus package, or a badly-fragmented hard drive)? I know this is just another anecdote, but I'm writing this from a system that's about identical to your low-end box (1.8 GHz Sempron and 1.5 GB RAM, onboard NVidia 6100, XP Home SP3), and FF 6.0.2 is quite peppy and responsive. A new blank tab comes up instantly, and a new tab with a page doesn't take any longer to load than if I didn't open the tab. Granted, I don't keep 100 tabs open, but I often have 8-10 up. As for extensions, I have NoScript, PrefBar, and DownThemAll installed. At the moment, I have Thunderbird, GVim, PuTTY, OpenVPN, TigerVNC, and Oracle SQL Developer up and running (and SQL Developer, written in Java, is by nature a memory pig).

NoScript, above all else, is the reason I run Firefox. I don't even bother with AdBlockPlus, since static ads don't really bother me, and NoScript does a fine job of scrubbing out the annoyances.

Comment: Just use the watthour meter (Score 1) 219

by SIGBUS (#37413536) Attached to: On the topic of computer power consumption ...

If you have an old-school spinning-disc watthour meter that doesn't provide a direct wattage readout, you can use the disc and a stopwatch to measure your power draw. Note the value marked "Kh" on the meter, and measure the time it takes for the disc to make one revolution. You can then calculate the watts:

W = Kh / (t / 3600)

Of course, power demand may change while you're timing the disc. Also, you need a stopwatch with at least 1/5-second resolution; small differences in time can be significant.

Comment: Re:AWESOME! (Score 1) 284

by SIGBUS (#37350728) Attached to: Monthly Ubuntu Releases Proposed

I couldn't have said it better myself, although I haven't had a problem with drivers breaking. Still, it seriously pissed me off when they started screwing with my window buttons, and don't get me started on Unity - or GNOME 3 for that matter. Focus-follows-mouse, HELLO?! Where did you go?!!

I'm still wondering where I'll go once 10.04 LTS dries up. I'd go back to CentOS, but they've had real trouble keeping up with upstream releases over the last year. At that point, Scientific Linux may be my choice.

Comment: Re:Sprint coverage map: pure fantasy. (Score 1) 166

by SIGBUS (#37205792) Attached to: Verizon Makes It Easy To Go Over Your Data Cap

I get that it works for you, but why do people who never use a smartphone feel the need to comment on a topic based around people who use a smart phone and use it a lot?

Maybe because I wanted to get one that didn't cost more per month than my home internet connection, and wasn't saddled with misfeatures designed to con the victims, er, customers into spending even more? I'd love to be able to jump on the Internet wherever I go, whenever I want, but not if it's going to to be a neverending ripoff. Maybe you like bending over for the likes of Verizon and AT&T, but don't assume everyone else does.

As it is, the shortest book ever written is "Cell Phone Companies that Don't Suck."

If the path be beautiful, let us not ask where it leads. -- Anatole France

Working...