Forgot your password?
typodupeerror

Comment: Re:Hardly secret or surprising (Score 1) 484

by PachmanP (#36050094) Attached to: Crashed Helicopter Sparks Concern Over Stealth Secrets

The only stealth fighters that crashed were...

S/N 79-0785 was lost on 20 April 1982 during takeoff on its maiden flight in California, recovered.
S/N 80-0792 was lost on 11 July 1986 in California, recovered
S/N 85-0815 was lost on 14 October 1987 in Nevada, recovered
S/N 82-0801 was lost on 4 August 1992 in New Mexico, recovered
S/N 86-0822 was lost on 10 May 1995 in New Mexico, recovered
S/N 81-0793 was lost on 14 September 1997 in Maryland during air show, recovered
S/N 82-0806 was lost on 27 March 1999 in Serbia, not recovered

No stealth fighters crashed or were lost in Iraq or Kuwait

THAT"S WHAT THEY WANT YOU TO BELIEVE!111

Comment: Re:Actually, the New Yorker article was quite tame (Score 1) 426

by PachmanP (#35222638) Attached to: Paul Haggis vs. the Church of Scientology

...ALL superstitions are evil because they are untrue, and propagation of lies is evil. Scientology is merely a newer lie more easily exposed.
Faith is shit, prove thy superstition or expect no respect, for superstition deserves none nor do believers therein.

In the absence of "superstitions" and/or faith or whatever you're ranting about, *there is no evil*. The whole concept of good and evil is based on the belief in something. Please at least try to be internally consistent when spouting about who does and does not deserve your respect. *rolls eyes*

Comment: Re:Let that be a lesson to you! (Score 1) 487

by PachmanP (#35127944) Attached to: Woman Gets Revenge Courtesy of Google Images

Since you haven't even attempted to perform the Turing test on me, I fail to see how you can assert that I don't pass the test. Hand in your geek card for lack of knowledge about your own trendy references.

Ok I accept your challege! Turing test at a time of your choosing.


...over a nice bottle of wine?

Comment: Re:If it can help reduce random violence (Score 2) 138

by PachmanP (#35081314) Attached to: Pub Patrons Down Under Subject To Biometric Datamining

At the very least I'm thinking...how are you gonna get laid going to such bars? I mean, unless you're married (and sometimes even if you are) isn't one of the main reasons for going to a bar is to find a good looking chick to hook up with?

That ain't gonna happen in a place where people are randomly throwing punches (or worse).

Poor english to english translation. They're confusing getting laid out with getting laid.

Comment: Re:Eh, it was probably right (Score 1) 166

by PachmanP (#35081096) Attached to: Blogger Sued By Restaurant For Bad Review

hey are on the low side here. We have several great teppanyaki places here. The only thing keeping benihaha from obscurity is their past reputation, their name, that they had deep pockets when they picked their location and yuppies who have no taste. There two locally owned teppanyaki places local to me and one fantastic sushi place. I love locally owned businesses as they pay taxes to local government and are a part of the community. In all three of those restaurants I am greeted by name if the server knows me and I've never gotten a bad meal.

You have to go look for them rather than stop in the mall's choke and puke outlot area or the faux trendy areas with 'upscale' chains that slop mystery sauce and near dehydrated veggies in a wok and serve it too you without having too much of the cooks sweat as an added awesome sauch.

Gah! Pretentious much?

Comment: Re:type of game matters! (Score 1) 220

by PachmanP (#35070134) Attached to: Are Gamers Safer Drivers?

I think it is more to do with the competitive nature of games. In real life the best way to drive is considerately and somewhat cautiously, but in a game the only thing that really matters is beating everyone else to the finish line.

It sounds like somebody doesn't drive in a location with a lot of bad traffic.

Never invest your money in anything that eats or needs repainting. -- Billy Rose

Working...