Slashdot is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop


Forgot your password?

Comment I don't need no stinking Outlook... (Score 2) 200

I just got an amazing toy. It's got all these free built in applications. It comes with an e-mail client. It has a beautiful 1920x1080 display and responsive touch screen..

It was only $229 and it was made by Asus for Google. Seriously, you intend to compete with that? The margins on the device have to be thin. How does Microsoft plan to make it up? Do I need an Office 365 subscription to go with it?

Call me skeptical. The first iteration of tablet wasn't that good, I still hate Windows 8, and the price point you'd have to get to in order to make me consider a Win8 tablet is so low, it would be unprofitable. Those people who would buy the Win8 tablet at $200, will just as happy with the Android equivalent.

Comment Re:microsoft knows it... (Score 1) 253

I think you may be right on this one. I use my Windows machines for everyday work, Quicken, etc, My e-mail is on a Linux VM somewhere, and my tablet is a brand new Nexus 7 2nd Ed. I must say, I really like the Nexus too. It really does everything I need in a form factor that is hard to beat and at $229!

Not a lot of margin for MS in a $229 device where the OS is free..

Comment Re:Think you may want to look at his logs (Score 1) 221

I do the same... I love it when they tell me how safe they are.. I am sure they all have PhD's in Physics and can tell me how ionizing and non-ionizing radiation are different and how various parts of the body absorb radiation differently. They don't care if you are delayed, they just set you aside and ask the next victim to step up.

One day I was at the airport and a RapidScan technician was leaving for the day. He was wearing a radiation dosimeter, because clearly the company is concerned enough to monitor their employees exposure.

I use to fly 150k domestically. I no longer do. I'm not sure the scanners did much for aircraft security as lets face it, Abdulmutallah, Reid, and that crazy Jet Blue pilot all managed to get through security and were stopped by -- passengers, not overgrown xray machines.

I don't believe terrorists are going to be stopped by $12/hr screeners with video oogling equipment. The terrorists are far smarter and more dedicated to their cause. Nothing the US government will ever do will change that.

Besides, you wouldn't believe the things people shove up their ass..

Comment But it still doesn't work.... (Score 1) 168

I formerly flew for a living and got patted down atleast once or twice a week because I won't use the Rapidscan 1000 which is installed at Phoenix Airport. I have no idea whether 10 uRems of ionizing radiation is bad for me, but all the Rapidscan techs all wear radiation dosimeters. Clearly, someone is concerned. Alas, I get enough radiation as is - so why risk it? I don't have the same concerns about the Thz non-ionizing radiation units made by L3. However, I don't have that job anymore and won't get on an airplane unless someone is paying me!

These scanners are worthless though. I am an American citizen with provable birth record, gun licenses, completed KnownTraveler screening, and my strong dislike of Muslim fundamentalism is far from hidden. I am a member of multiple frequent flier programs and if I haven't tried to blow something up in 7 years, why would I start now? Could I go through the metal scanner instead? No. However, the black muslim immigrant in head scarf who works at the Starbucks is allowed to.

Who do you think is more likely to be a threat? According to the brain trust at the TSA, me.

How long before Al Qaeda has people terrorists board with Ebola or Hemoraggic Fever or some other horrendous disease that you can't treat? As long as we're focused on "things", we're doomed. Terrorists have proven to be smarter than the US government at every turn.

Besides, couldn't the terrorist just stick it up their ass and get through anyway? Our government should send the scanners to the same destination.

Comment Drop in the bucket... (Score 1) 275

Hmmmm, I wonder who owns the multiple new CRS-3 chock full of 10G Ethernet ports next to my cage... I have a pretty good idea - and 500M is a drop in the bucket for them.

I have been to an awful lot of data centers and it's not trivial to build or maintain them. I am aware of more than one that wanted to expand but couldn't because of power issues. One of them was going to require a "couple" of new substations. Another one needed a new power main that would require substantial trenching through an urban area.... Datacenters are not built like normal buildings. They are built to be hardened, self-sufficient, and have multiple levels of fail-safes -- that isn't cheap. If my home AC goes out, I'll just be hot. If a Liebert 20 ton AC fails in one of these places, blade servers overheat, vast arrays of businesses go dark.

Dimon's comments are interesting, but the costs don't strike me as far outside the norm. There are more than a few companies out there who have made very major expenditures in infrastructure.. Most don't detail it, for obvious reasons.

Comment Re:The end. (Score 1) 72

It's really never made sense in the last few years to continue to have terrestrial OTA TV. Crazy you say? Not really, half the time people can't even receive the signals anyway without cable or satellite. We'd be better off just letting the satellite and cable companies deal with distribution and subsidize life line service for the people who cannot otherwise afford it. In so many markets cable penetration is 80-90% anyway.

Ka spot beam satellites allow essentially the entire US local channel markets to be transmitted over satellite. There are no dead zones. No areas where the antenna isn't strong enough. TV broadcasts take up a lot of valuable spectrum that could be used better. In addtion, TV broadcasts would be easier to obtain if delivered to consumers via unencrypted satellite -- not only that -- it costs a lot to power all those transmitters that not many people watch anyway..

I believe strongly in the value of local broadcasts, but our over the air mechanism for home delivery is dated at best and woefully inefficient at worst. Broadcasters and consumers should have better options for signal delivery. I wish the government would take some of that money their getting to make it happen.

Comment Re:Heard it all before (Score 1) 129

You are correct!

Level 3, Qwest, and others have lots of unused fiber (much which may never be used) in conduits that they can light up if they see fit. Right now they may have 160 wavelengths on a pair of fibers, maybe 320 lambdas on the next gen of Infineras. Today the lambdas are OC-192s, tomorrow they will be OC-768s, and then 100G Ethernet. All on the same 2 fibers already in the ground.. And they have lots more than 2 fibers available to expand on.

Who in their right mind would try to compete with that? Their cost to attempt to run you out of buisiness is absurdly low.

Comment So, lets say you need a 10 Mhz Reference (Score 2, Interesting) 316

And your GPS satellites got blasted out of orbit or a solar storm wipes out all of those satellite resources?

Your SONET networks and cell phone stuff are gonna need it. Your 8-VSB exiter may as well. Single Freq. Networks.

Where do you get an accurate reference from?

WWV? I haven't seen anything other than a GPS reference at any telco facility/cell site. If there ever is a loss of GPS, it's gonna be interesting.

Comment Ummm, not exactly. (Score 1) 153

I don't see Google, Microsoft, Facebook and the like laying fiber in the ground all across the country. In some cases, they are buying it. I suspect they are mostly buying lambdas and dedicated circuits *FROM* Tier 1 providers. However, instead of going over the Tier 1 providers IP network, they are buying an OC-12 directly to where their customers are.

Who would they possibly buy a point to point OC-12 from? Who has fiber in the ground and wavelength to spare? A tier 1 provider. Traffic is shifting, but not really AWAY from those who have the infrastructure to provide transit services.

Same companies, different product.

Comment Re:Why on earth going propietary? Oh, it's Apple.. (Score 2, Informative) 332

HD-SDI never made it to the consumer market because it is expensive to handle and nobodys TV will decode it.

As for the rest of your comment:

"Single coax cable terminated with BNCs that can deliver 4k (four times the resolution of 1080p) or higher with 16 channels of audio, all uncompressed, at a length of over 100m"

No, what you are referring to is 3Gig, which is actually 2 HD-SDI cables and my experience has been that 300 feet out is sometimes a touchy place to be. 3gig on 1 cable = fiber

Comment Re:Malicious or ignorant? (Score 1) 526

Reasonable MSOs have restricted program routers and isolated adult islands. No comment about how I know this.

Malicious use of video router - inside job..
Malicious use of a CherryPicker - inside job..
Poor use of access controls - Ignorance

Assuming they already waterboarded the on-site operators... This wasn't some random Capt. Midnight hacker with an uplink available to him. This person had the ability to the control LAN via VPN and then had the passwords to make those changes.

This person was an operator or engineer at Comcast..

Slashdot Top Deals

Science and religion are in full accord but science and faith are in complete discord.