Forgot your password?

typodupeerror

Comment: Re:The end. (Score 1) 72

by NuttyBee (#34633694) Attached to: AT&T To Pay $1.93 Billion For FLO TV Spectrum

It's really never made sense in the last few years to continue to have terrestrial OTA TV. Crazy you say? Not really, half the time people can't even receive the signals anyway without cable or satellite. We'd be better off just letting the satellite and cable companies deal with distribution and subsidize life line service for the people who cannot otherwise afford it. In so many markets cable penetration is 80-90% anyway.

Ka spot beam satellites allow essentially the entire US local channel markets to be transmitted over satellite. There are no dead zones. No areas where the antenna isn't strong enough. TV broadcasts take up a lot of valuable spectrum that could be used better. In addtion, TV broadcasts would be easier to obtain if delivered to consumers via unencrypted satellite -- not only that -- it costs a lot to power all those transmitters that not many people watch anyway..

I believe strongly in the value of local broadcasts, but our over the air mechanism for home delivery is dated at best and woefully inefficient at worst. Broadcasters and consumers should have better options for signal delivery. I wish the government would take some of that money their getting to make it happen.

Comment: Re:Heard it all before (Score 1) 129

by NuttyBee (#32393900) Attached to: A New Neutral, Long-Haul Fiber Network

You are correct!

Level 3, Qwest, and others have lots of unused fiber (much which may never be used) in conduits that they can light up if they see fit. Right now they may have 160 wavelengths on a pair of fibers, maybe 320 lambdas on the next gen of Infineras. Today the lambdas are OC-192s, tomorrow they will be OC-768s, and then 100G Ethernet. All on the same 2 fibers already in the ground.. And they have lots more than 2 fibers available to expand on.

Who in their right mind would try to compete with that? Their cost to attempt to run you out of buisiness is absurdly low.

Comment: So, lets say you need a 10 Mhz Reference (Score 2, Interesting) 316

by NuttyBee (#30746704) Attached to: US Coast Guard Intends To Kill LORAN-C

And your GPS satellites got blasted out of orbit or a solar storm wipes out all of those satellite resources?

Your SONET networks and cell phone stuff are gonna need it. Your 8-VSB exiter may as well. Single Freq. Networks.

Where do you get an accurate reference from?

WWV? I haven't seen anything other than a GPS reference at any telco facility/cell site. If there ever is a loss of GPS, it's gonna be interesting.

Comment: Ummm, not exactly. (Score 1) 153

by NuttyBee (#29773937) Attached to: Internet Traffic Shifting Away From Tier-1 Carriers

I don't see Google, Microsoft, Facebook and the like laying fiber in the ground all across the country. In some cases, they are buying it. I suspect they are mostly buying lambdas and dedicated circuits *FROM* Tier 1 providers. However, instead of going over the Tier 1 providers IP network, they are buying an OC-12 directly to where their customers are.

Who would they possibly buy a point to point OC-12 from? Who has fiber in the ground and wavelength to spare? A tier 1 provider. Traffic is shifting, but not really AWAY from those who have the infrastructure to provide transit services.

Same companies, different product.

Comment: Not So Fast (Score 4, Informative) 279

by NuttyBee (#29763193) Attached to: MS Says All Sidekick Data Recovered, But Damage Done

I have a Sidekick.

I still, a week later, can't get e-mail on it. My contacts were never lost, but the damn thing still doesn't work! I'm getting tired of waiting.

My contract is up in August and I'm going to find a phone that stores everything locally AND a new provider. I have learned my lesson.

Comment: Re:Why on earth going propietary? Oh, it's Apple.. (Score 2, Informative) 332

by NuttyBee (#29558197) Attached to: Apple Behind Intel's USB Competitor?

HD-SDI never made it to the consumer market because it is expensive to handle and nobodys TV will decode it.

As for the rest of your comment:

"Single coax cable terminated with BNCs that can deliver 4k (four times the resolution of 1080p) or higher with 16 channels of audio, all uncompressed, at a length of over 100m"

No, what you are referring to is 3Gig, which is actually 2 HD-SDI cables and my experience has been that 300 feet out is sometimes a touchy place to be. 3gig on 1 cable = fiber

Comment: Re:Malicious or ignorant? (Score 1) 526

by NuttyBee (#26719939) Attached to: Comcast Apologizes For Super Bowl Porn Glitch

Reasonable MSOs have restricted program routers and isolated adult islands. No comment about how I know this.

Malicious use of video router - inside job..
Malicious use of a CherryPicker - inside job..
Poor use of access controls - Ignorance

Assuming they already waterboarded the on-site operators... This wasn't some random Capt. Midnight hacker with an uplink available to him. This person had the ability to the control LAN via VPN and then had the passwords to make those changes.

This person was an operator or engineer at Comcast..

Comment: Re:Will this change anything? (Score 2, Interesting) 438

by NuttyBee (#26619207) Attached to: Senate Approves 4-Month Delay In Digital TV Switch

I have been working on the digital transition for a certain national TV provider for 4 years. We are DONE and ready to go all digital. In 1996, the drop dead date was set as 2006. It was extended to 2009. 13 years.

How much longer do we really need?

Those who aren't ready will get ready really quick. I'm happy to get them a kick in the pants.

No discipline is ever requisite to force attendance upon lectures which are really worth the attending. -- Adam Smith, "The Wealth of Nations"

Working...