Forgot your password?

typodupeerror

Comment: Re:Common knowledge (Score 1) 670

by Nitage (#36448214) Attached to: C++ the Clear Winner In Google's Language Performance Tests
A compacting GC is often a win over naive manual memory management - they improve cache coherency and speed up dynamic allocation. Of course, using smarter allocation techniques (small object pools etc) instead of general purpose allocators (new/malloc) can provide even grater benefits to GC - but that's what Google were talking about when they said "extensive tuning efforts". In other words, a C# or Java application using GC can outperform a naive C++ application because of, not in spite of, GC. The worst case is when somebody decides that every dynamic allocation belongs inside a shared_ptr *shudder*.

Comment: Re:Socially engineered attacks ARE a huge problem (Score 1) 205

by Nitage (#34571770) Attached to: NSS Labs Browser Report Says IE Is the Best, Google Disagrees

Or perhaps we should let the work stand for itself, evaluate the methodology, strip away the marketing spin, and come away with some nugget of truth, regardless of who funded it.

We can't evaluate the methodology because the methodology hasn't been published. From what we do know, neither the testing nor the data released was objective - the tests compared bleeding edge releases of IE9 to an obsolete versions of Chrome, and the data they chose to publicise focussed on the single areqa in which IE9 triumphed, despite it performing poorly in other areas.

Comment: Re:Five months maternity leave? (Score 2, Informative) 1036

by Nitage (#32754956) Attached to: Google To Add Pay To Cover a Tax For Gays
It says five months of maternity leave with full pay. In the UK, it's 6 weeks at 90% salary, 33 weeks at £124.88 or 90% of salary (whichever is lower) and 13 weeks unpaid. Google's terms are much, much better than most of Europe. There are exceptions - but only a handful (Lithuania gives 100% salary for 52 weeks + 85% for 52 weeks - but that's almost twice as generous as the next best).

Comment: Re:Still unfair.. (Score 2, Insightful) 1036

by Nitage (#32754894) Attached to: Google To Add Pay To Cover a Tax For Gays
Most heterosexual couples wait several years in between starting their relationship and getting married - during which period they won't be entitled to this perk, but homosexual employees will. It's not really a problem though - more like replacing a discriminatory policy with a small effect with another discriminatory policy with a tiny effect. Not an especially big deal, but certainly a big enough deal to make the grandparent's "give me a fucking break" unjustified.

Comment: Re:Andrew (Score 2, Insightful) 1036

by Nitage (#32754380) Attached to: Google To Add Pay To Cover a Tax For Gays
I think what happens is that health benefits to your spouse are tax free. Health benefits to your partner to whom you're not married are not - and gay couples can't get married. Of course this screws over the non-married heterosexual couples - maybe Google should just pay the tax for everyone who gets charged it.

You can't carve your way to success without cutting remarks.

Working...