Forgot your password?
typodupeerror

Comment: Re:Iron Dome is clearly a conspiracy! (Score 1) 454

by NitWit005 (#47505843) Attached to: MIT's Ted Postol Presents More Evidence On Iron Dome Failures
The problem is, history would suggest that you might be wrong, despite your firsthand experience. During the Gulf War, people were extremely confident that the American patriot missiles were shooting down Iraqi missiles, and they pointed to the clear rocket flying into the sky followed by a nice pop. It turned out that was often the operators detonating them after a miss to be safe. It's still not clear how many were shot down, but it's definitely not what was perceived (or claimed) at the time.

Comment: Re:Is this all that surprising? (Score 3, Informative) 105

by NitWit005 (#46925517) Attached to: Computer Game Reveals 'Space-Time' Neurons In the Eye
Even just reading from that quote, the information did actually reach the brain first. It just didn't reach what the authors define as the "higher brain centers". You're not contradiction him. I'm not sure how the electromagnetic field strength of the heart was supposed to be relevant either.

Comment: Cost and opportunities (Score 2) 306

by NitWit005 (#46812505) Attached to: Our Education System Is Failing IT
He asks the question: "So why do we tolerate IT pros who don't understand the basics of how a computer or network works?".

If someone is skilled at IT, deeply understands computers and networking, and has critical thinking skills, they can get a better job. There are few people like that anywhere. Why would they be sitting around in IT? They should be designing a router.

And frankly speaking, they don't need to know the deep depths of how everything works. It would be silly for a hospital to demand that every staff member have the highest level of education. It's a waste of resources. The vast majority of work can be done by less skilled people. Just like in a hospital, if a diagnosis seems difficult, you can bring in the expert. You don't need a building full of experts. Sure, it would be nice, but the waste would be staggering.

Comment: No, the liberal arts are too easy (Score 1) 580

Every major field that's taught in university has vastly more information than can be taught to students. The STEM fields are hardly unique that way.

What's odd is that the science and technology majors make an effort to push students as hard as possible, and the other majors choose not to. Look back on the standards at schools 100 years ago and you'll often see that the liberal arts curium seems way more difficult and thorough than it is today.

Comment: Assuming they use cookies (Score 1) 177

by NitWit005 (#44197769) Attached to: Student Project Could Kill Digital Ad Targeting
A lot of ad platforms already have a non-cookie mechanism working. Storing hashes of user agent and IP address is common. You have to go through a proxy or otherwise change IP address for that not to work. It's easy to find services advertising this as a feature: http://www.ipfingerprint.com/we_dont_use_cookies.aspx The truth is that cookies aren't that great for tracking. People want to know your activity across browsers and devices. That requires using additional information like phone unique identifier (sent by apps), website logins, billing address fields, coupon usage, and so on. That information can be tied together to track you. You're not going to be able to prevent that kind of tracking by messing with cookies.

Comment: Re:Computers can't bluff (Score 1) 352

by NitWit005 (#43473745) Attached to: Why Self-Driving Cars Are Still a Long Way Down the Road
Google's cars already have some social interactions like this built in. If it's at a 4 way intersection with stop signs and people aren't obeying the rules to let it through, it will eventually assert itself just like a human driver would. Any defensive behavior a human does is programmable. They're all fairly simple when you get right down to it.

Comment: Perception Issue (Score 1) 208

by NitWit005 (#43145827) Attached to: The Hypocrisy In Silicon Valley's Big Talk On Innovation
There is definitely less risk taking, but there is a big issue of perception. Things just don't seem mind blowing after a while, even if there is tons of work left to be done in that area. You see this again and again: cars got boring, planes got boring, nuclear energy got boring, space flight got boring. Everything gets boring eventually. Most computing related areas have lost their cultural edge. It's hard to pitch things as being innovative, even if they really are, and have people buy the idea.

Comment: I'd question "unwittingly" (Score 1) 473

by NitWit005 (#43145737) Attached to: Facebook Knows If You're Gay, Use Drugs, Or Are a Republican
I'm going to go ahead and suggest that most people know the message they are sending when they like a page like "Republican National Comittie" or "GAY SEX CLIPs". The whole point of liking it is to 'tell the world'. In fact, if my wall is any indication, that's the ONLY reason people like things. Okay, that and websites that trick them into it.

In specifications, Murphy's Law supersedes Ohm's.

Working...