Line of sight between the operator and the model - has always been a legal requirement of operating R/C aircraft.
Did i though? http://www.engadget.com/2014/0... Its nothing but a really bloody accurate accelerometer.
The Gyro Compass was patented in 1911.
British Navy Invents Dead-reckoning.
I just can't help asking myself, What Could Possibly Go Wrong?
It is tetraethyl lead - just like cars used.
Thats a seriously optimistic read on the situation. https://www.faa.gov/about/init...
Nearly the entire worldwide fleet of piston powered aircraft still burn leaded gas.
No. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/T... Thorium reactors *burn* Thorium, and *produce* U-233.
But it is nice to know they are responding to relevant FOIA requests. https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/...
Take a look at the backstory: http://www.oregonlive.com/health/index.ssf/2013/12/oregons_health_exchange_woes_s_1.html
Since when was the failure of a business model a reason to violate the law? oh, wait, RIAA...
Eh, not so. Kodak is a leading producer of Medium Format sensors. Sensors that are much finer instruments than even the $8000 canon pro cameras.
eh, i think you're a little off the mark there. Badge Engineering is not exemplified by purchasing powerplants from another company. That is a practice which goes back to the very beginning of the industrial age. Badge engineering is taking an off the shelf product and putting your badge on it. Two cars that share a chassis/platform, also, are not badge engineering. Is an Audi A3 a badge engineered NewBeetle? I think not.